Suppr超能文献

慢性阻塞性肺疾病治疗的心脏效应。

Cardiac effects of current treatments of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Feb;4(2):149-64. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00518-4. Epub 2016 Jan 12.

Abstract

We review the cardiac safety of the drugs available at present for the maintenance treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in stable disease, focusing on inhaled long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) and long-acting β2 agonists (LABA), used either as a monotherapy or as a fixed-dose combination. We report the difficulties of, and pitfalls in, the investigation of the safety of drug treatments in COPD, which is hampered by the so-called COPD trial paradox: on the one hand, COPD is defined as a systemic disease and is frequently associated with comorbidities (especially cardiovascular comorbidities), which have an important effect on the prognosis of individual patients; on the other hand, patients with COPD and cardiovascular or other coexisting illnesses are often excluded from participation in randomised controlled clinical trials. In these trials, inhaled long-acting bronchodilators, both LAMA or LABA, or both, seem to be safe when used in the appropriate dose in adherent patients with COPD without uncontrolled cardiovascular disease or other notable comorbidities. However, the cardiac safety of LAMA and LABA is less evident when used inappropriately (eg, overdosing) or in patients with COPD and substantial cardiovascular disease, prolonged QTc interval, or polypharmacy. Potential warnings about rare cardiac events caused by COPD treatment from meta-analyses and observational studies need to be confirmed in high quality large randomised controlled trials. Finally, we briefly cover the cardiac safety issues of chronic oral drug treatments for COPD, encompassing theophylline, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, and macrolides.

摘要

我们回顾了目前用于稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)维持治疗的药物的心脏安全性,重点关注吸入长效抗胆碱能药物(LAMA)和长效β2 激动剂(LABA),这些药物单独使用或作为固定剂量联合使用。我们报告了在 COPD 药物治疗安全性研究中遇到的困难和陷阱,这是由于所谓的 COPD 试验悖论所致:一方面,COPD 被定义为一种系统性疾病,常伴有合并症(特别是心血管合并症),这些合并症对个体患者的预后有重要影响;另一方面,患有 COPD 及心血管或其他并存疾病的患者通常被排除在随机对照临床试验之外。在这些试验中,吸入长效支气管扩张剂,无论是 LAMA 还是 LABA,或两者联合使用,在适当剂量下,用于依从性良好的 COPD 患者,且无未控制的心血管疾病或其他显著合并症时,似乎是安全的。然而,当不恰当地使用(例如,过量使用)或在 COPD 合并大量心血管疾病、延长 QTc 间隔或多药治疗的患者中使用时,LAMA 和 LABA 的心脏安全性就不太明显。来自荟萃分析和观察性研究的关于 COPD 治疗引起罕见心脏事件的潜在警告需要在高质量的大型随机对照试验中得到证实。最后,我们简要介绍了 COPD 慢性口服药物治疗的心脏安全性问题,包括茶碱、磷酸二酯酶抑制剂和大环内酯类药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验