Gaudioso Fulvio, Turel Ofir, Galimberti Carlo
Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.
Department of Information Systems, California State University, Fullerton, USA.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;219:14-20.
The purpose of this study is to theoretically develop and empirically examine a general coping theory model which explicates the indirect effects of key job-related techno-stressors on job exhaustion. Through this study, we show that techno-stress creators are detrimental to employee well-being and should be treated accordingly. Specifically, we first argue that key techno-stress creators on the job, namely techno-invasion and techno-overload, drive unpleasant states such as work-family conflict and distress. Next, we rely on general coping theory and argue that people respond to these states differently, but with both adaptive and maladaptive technology-specific coping strategies. Adaptive coping behaviors are argued to ultimately reduce work exhaustion, and maladaptive coping strategies are argued to increase it. The proposed model was tested and validated with structural equation modeling techniques applied to self-reported data obtained from a sample of 242 employees of a large organization in the United States. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
本研究的目的是从理论上构建并实证检验一个通用的应对理论模型,该模型阐释了关键的与工作相关的技术压力源对工作倦怠的间接影响。通过本研究,我们表明技术压力源对员工福祉有害,应予以相应对待。具体而言,我们首先认为工作中的关键技术压力源,即技术入侵和技术过载,会引发诸如工作-家庭冲突和困扰等不愉快状态。接下来,我们依据通用应对理论,认为人们对这些状态的反应各不相同,但会采用适应性和非适应性的特定技术应对策略。适应性应对行为最终会减少工作倦怠,而非适应性应对策略则会增加工作倦怠。所提出的模型通过应用于从美国一家大型组织的242名员工样本中获得的自我报告数据的结构方程建模技术进行了测试和验证。并讨论了该研究对理论和实践的启示。