Suppr超能文献

种植体固位修复体:球帽式与锥状附着体 - 一项随机对照临床试验

Implant-retained prostheses: ball vs. conus attachments - A randomized controlled clinical trial.

作者信息

Cepa Sandy, Koller Beatrice, Spies Benedikt Christopher, Stampf Susanne, Kohal Ralf-Joachim

机构信息

Private Practice, Riegel, Germany.

Private Practice, Much, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Feb;28(2):177-185. doi: 10.1111/clr.12779. Epub 2016 Jan 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate implant survival, peri-implant tissue conditions, prosthodontic maintenance requirements and patient satisfaction of two differently retained implant-supported mandibular overdentures (IOD) after the 3 years of observation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-five patients with edentulous mandibles received two implants each. Twelve patients were randomly selected to receive ball attachments, whereas 13 patients received prefabricated coni. Implant survival, peri-implant parameters (modified Plaque Index, Bleeding on Probing, modified Gingival Index, probing depth and marginal bone loss) and patient satisfaction were assessed. Additionally, prosthodontic maintenance was monitored. Clinical and radiographic follow-ups were performed 1, 2 and 3 years after prosthetic delivery. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate complication rates.

RESULTS

After a mean observation period of 29.6 months, an implant survival rate of 100% could be observed. There were no significant differences in the peri-implant parameters. During the observation period, six patients with conus attachment refused to further participate in follow-ups due to dissatisfaction with their treatment and had to be regarded as dropouts. Based on the Kaplan-Meier method, inacceptable retention was calculated for 80% and 75% of the patients in the ball and the conus groups, respectively. Patient satisfaction was 64% for the ball- and 100% for the conus-retained IODs, the latter only respecting five of initially 13 patients.

CONCLUSION

The evaluated treatment method revealed high implant survival rates, but the prosthetic reconstruction required intensive maintenance. Therefore, a trend toward the reduced patient satisfaction was observed, and the promoted economy of the evaluated attachment systems should be questioned. For the conical attachment, the recommendation of the manufacturer is to use four interforaminal implants to support a removable prostheses.

摘要

目的

观察两种不同固位方式的种植体支持下颌覆盖义齿(IOD)3年的种植体存留率、种植体周围组织状况、修复体维护需求及患者满意度。

材料与方法

25例下颌无牙颌患者,每人植入2枚种植体。随机选取12例患者使用球帽附着体,13例患者使用预制圆锥型附着体。评估种植体存留率、种植体周围参数(改良菌斑指数、探诊出血、改良牙龈指数、探诊深度和边缘骨吸收)及患者满意度。此外,监测修复体维护情况。在修复体戴入后1年、2年和3年进行临床及影像学随访。采用Kaplan-Meier法计算并发症发生率。

结果

平均观察期29.6个月后,种植体存留率达100%。种植体周围参数无显著差异。观察期内,6例使用圆锥型附着体的患者因对治疗不满意拒绝继续随访,应视为失访。根据Kaplan-Meier法计算,球帽组和圆锥型组分别有80%和75%的患者出现固位不良。球帽固位的IOD患者满意度为64%,圆锥型固位的IOD患者满意度为100%,后者仅涉及最初13例患者中的5例。

结论

所评估的治疗方法显示种植体存留率高,但修复重建需要强化维护。因此,观察到患者满意度有下降趋势,所评估附着系统的经济性也应受到质疑。对于圆锥型附着体,制造商建议使用4枚下颌孔间种植体支持可摘修复体。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验