Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Diabetes Care and Research Program, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Can J Diabetes. 2016 Feb;40(1):84-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2015.10.006.
Diabetes health coaching has not been adequately assessed in individuals with type 2 diabetes. The objective of this review was to synthesize the evidence of health coaching for individuals with diabetes to determine the effects of coaching on diabetes control, specifically on glycated hemoglobin (A1C) levels.
The EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched from inception to January 2015. Reference lists from important publications were also reviewed. At least 2 evaluators independently screened and extracted data from eligible studies.
A total of 8 trials met the selection criteria, which included 724 adult participants; 353 participants were randomized to a diabetes health coaching intervention, and 371 were randomized to usual care. The pooled effect of diabetes health coaching overall was a statistically significant reduction of A1C levels by 0.32 (95% CI, -0.50 to -0.15). Longer diabetes health coaching exposure (>6 months) resulted in a 0.57% reduction in A1C levels (95% CI, -0.76 to -0.38), compared to shorter diabetes health coaching exposure (≤6 months) (-0.23%; 95% CI, -0.37 to -0.09). Across all studies, diabetes health coaching consisted of goal setting, knowledge acquisition, individualized care and frequent follow up.
Diabetes health coaching has an emerging role in healthcare that facilitates self-care, behaviour change and offers frequent follow up and support. This review finds that health coaching for those with diabetes is an effective intervention for improving glycemic control, which may be of greater benefit when offered in addition to existing diabetes care.
2 型糖尿病患者的糖尿病健康指导尚未得到充分评估。本研究的目的是综合评估糖尿病健康指导对个体的影响,以明确指导对糖尿病控制的效果,尤其是糖化血红蛋白(A1C)水平的影响。
从建库至 2015 年 1 月,检索了 EMBASE、MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsychINFO 和 Cochrane 中央对照试验注册库。还对重要出版物的参考文献进行了回顾。至少有 2 位评估员独立筛选并提取了合格研究的数据。
共有 8 项试验符合入选标准,共纳入 724 名成年参与者;353 名参与者被随机分配至糖尿病健康指导干预组,371 名参与者被随机分配至常规护理组。总体上,糖尿病健康指导的效果是 A1C 水平显著降低 0.32(95%CI:-0.50 至 -0.15)。与较短的糖尿病健康指导(≤6 个月)相比,较长的糖尿病健康指导(>6 个月)使 A1C 水平降低了 0.57%(95%CI:-0.76 至 -0.38)。所有研究中的糖尿病健康指导均包括设定目标、获取知识、个体化护理和频繁随访。
糖尿病健康指导在医疗保健中发挥着越来越重要的作用,有助于自我护理、行为改变,并提供频繁的随访和支持。本研究发现,针对糖尿病患者的健康指导是改善血糖控制的有效干预措施,当与现有的糖尿病护理相结合时,可能更有益处。