• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骶神经刺激——隐性成本(未涵盖的)。

Sacral nerve stimulation--hidden costs (uncovered).

作者信息

Zeiton M, Faily Sara, Nicholson James, Telford Karen, Sharma Abhiram

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Trust, Manchester, UK.

University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 May;31(5):1005-1010. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2512-y. Epub 2016 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1007/s00384-016-2512-y
PMID:26833472
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study is to determine the occurrence of surgical revision in a cohort of patients treated with sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for faecal incontinence and constipation and to establish the types of procedures performed and indications for surgery.

METHOD

From the years 2002 to 2014, 125 patients were identified who had undergone permanent SNS therapy with 36 (28.8 %) patients requiring surgical intervention postimplantation. These cases were retrospectively reviewed (range of follow-up 1-99 months).

RESULTS

Over a total of 1512 months of SNS treatment, 51 unplanned surgical procedures were required in 36 patients. At present, 48 procedures have been performed at an average of 2.6 years following implantation and three patients are awaiting surgery. Lead-related problems accounted for 30 (58.8 %) procedures at an average of 1.7 years affecting 22 patients. Battery and implantable pulse generator-related problems attributed to 13 procedures (25.5 %) in 12 patients at an average of 5.0 years. Battery depletion occurred in seven patients at an average of 5.4 years. Surgical revision was required to replace, remove, or resite various components of the SNS system. Indications for surgery included lead damage, pain and loss or lack of SNS efficacy. Explantation was warranted in six patients due to poor SNS efficacy, pain, infection and facilitation of a magnetic resonance imaging scan. This was performed at an average of 1.6 years.

CONCLUSION

A considerable proportion of patients treated with SNS therapy require surgical revision. These unplanned procedures are associated with substantial unexpected costs that financially burden SNS services.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定一组接受骶神经刺激(SNS)治疗大便失禁和便秘的患者中手术翻修的发生率,并确定所进行的手术类型及手术指征。

方法

在2002年至2014年期间,共识别出125例接受永久性SNS治疗的患者,其中36例(28.8%)患者在植入后需要手术干预。对这些病例进行回顾性分析(随访时间为1 - 99个月)。

结果

在总共1512个月的SNS治疗期间,36例患者共需要进行51次非计划内手术。目前,已在植入后平均2.6年进行了48次手术,3例患者正在等待手术。与电极相关的问题导致30次(58.8%)手术,平均1.7年影响22例患者。与电池和植入式脉冲发生器相关的问题导致12例患者进行了13次手术(25.5%),平均5.0年。7例患者出现电池耗尽,平均5.4年。需要进行手术翻修以更换、移除或重新安置SNS系统的各个组件。手术指征包括电极损坏、疼痛以及SNS疗效丧失或缺乏。6例患者因SNS疗效不佳、疼痛、感染以及为便于进行磁共振成像扫描而进行了移除手术。平均在1.6年进行。

结论

接受SNS治疗的患者中有相当一部分需要手术翻修。这些非计划内手术会带来大量意外费用,给SNS服务带来经济负担。

相似文献

1
Sacral nerve stimulation--hidden costs (uncovered).骶神经刺激——隐性成本(未涵盖的)。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 May;31(5):1005-1010. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2512-y. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
2
Exhausted implanted pulse generator in sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: What next in daily practice for patients?用于治疗大便失禁的骶神经刺激植入式脉冲发生器耗尽:日常临床中这类患者接下来该如何治疗?
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Feb;31(2):439-44. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2433-1. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
3
Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence - efficacy confirmed from a two-centre prospectively maintained database.骶神经刺激治疗大便失禁——来自两个中心前瞻性维护数据库的疗效证实
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Feb;31(2):421-8. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2411-7. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
4
Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: medium-term follow-up from a single institution.骶神经刺激治疗大便失禁:来自单一机构的中期随访
ANZ J Surg. 2017 Jun;87(6):462-466. doi: 10.1111/ans.13605. Epub 2016 May 19.
5
Is the efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence dependent on the number of active electrode poles achieved during permanent lead insertion?骶神经刺激治疗大便失禁的疗效是否取决于永久电极植入过程中激活的电极极数?
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Nov;18(11):O414-O419. doi: 10.1111/codi.13509.
6
Sacral nerve stimulation for voiding dysfunction: One institution's 11-year experience.骶神经刺激治疗排尿功能障碍:一家机构的11年经验。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(1):19-28; discussion 36. doi: 10.1002/nau.20345.
7
What is the best option for failed sphincter repair?肛门括约肌修复失败后,哪种方法是最佳选择?
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Apr;16(4):298-303. doi: 10.1111/codi.12525.
8
Quality of life and morbidity after permanent sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence.永久性骶神经刺激治疗大便失禁后的生活质量和发病率
Arch Surg. 2007 Jan;142(1):8-13. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.142.1.8.
9
Outcome and cost analysis of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence.骶神经刺激治疗大便失禁的疗效与成本分析
Br J Surg. 2006 Nov;93(11):1411-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5491.
10
Resource implications of running a sacral neuromodulation service: a 10-year experience.开展骶神经调节服务的资源影响:十年经验
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Sep;16(9):719-22. doi: 10.1111/codi.12686.

引用本文的文献

1
Integration of brain-computer interfaces with sacral nerve stimulation: a vision for closed-loop, volitional control of bladder function in neurogenic patients through real-time cortical signal modulation and peripheral neuro-stimulation.脑机接口与骶神经刺激的整合:通过实时皮层信号调制和外周神经刺激实现对神经源性患者膀胱功能的闭环自主控制的设想。
World J Urol. 2025 May 13;43(1):301. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05683-5.
2
Identification of Perioperative Risk Factors for Early Sacral Nerve Stimulator Explantation: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.早期骶神经刺激器取出术围手术期危险因素的识别:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 29;14(7):2363. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072363.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical approaches to fecal incontinence in the adult.成人粪便失禁的手术治疗方法。
J Visc Surg. 2014 Feb;151(1):29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2013.12.011. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
2
Review of sacral neuromodulation for management of constipation.骶神经调节治疗便秘的综述
Surg Innov. 2013 Dec;20(6):614-24. doi: 10.1177/1553350613475882. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
3
Sacral nerve stimulation.骶神经刺激
A case of lead migration after sacral neuromodulation with erosion into the rectum.
一例骶神经调节术后铅电极迁移并侵蚀直肠的病例。
Urol Case Rep. 2024 Nov 27;58:102894. doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2024.102894. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Device-Related Reoperations 8 Years Following Sacral Neuromodulation Implantation in Older Women.老年女性骶神经调节植入术后8年的器械相关再次手术
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Dec;35(12):2349-2355. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05891-4. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
5
Reprogramming Sacral Neuromodulation for Sub-Optimal Outcomes: Evidence and Recommendations for Clinical Practice.重新编程骶神经调节以改善次优结果:临床实践的证据和建议。
Neuromodulation. 2021 Oct;24(7):1247-1257. doi: 10.1111/ner.13494. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
6
Anorectal angle at rest predicting successful sacral nerve stimulation in idiopathic fecal incontinence-a cohort analysis.静息时的肛管直肠角预测特发性大便失禁患者骶神经刺激治疗的成功率——一项队列分析
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Dec;35(12):2293-2299. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03720-w. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
7
Patterns of tined lead migration in sacral nerve modulation.骶神经调节中带线铅迁移的模式。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jun;35(6):1163-1166. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03530-0. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
8
Clinical efficacy of lead revisions during the test phase in sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence.骶神经调节治疗大便失禁测试阶段导线修正的临床疗效
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Aug;34(8):1369-1374. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03325-y. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
9
Sacral nerve stimulation for constipation: long-term outcomes.经直肠骶神经刺激治疗便秘:长期疗效。
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Jun;23(6):559-564. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02011-z. Epub 2019 May 30.
10
Success and Complication Rates After Sacral Neuromodulation for Fecal Incontinence and Constipation: A Single-center Follow-up Study.骶神经调节治疗大便失禁和便秘后的成功率及并发症发生率:一项单中心随访研究
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019 Jan 31;25(1):159-170. doi: 10.5056/jnm17106.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2011 Jun 17;131(12):1190-3. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.10.1417.
4
Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: optimizing outcome and managing complications.经骶神经刺激治疗大便失禁:优化疗效和处理并发症。
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Aug;13(8):e196-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02646.x.
5
How sacral nerve stimulation works in patients with faecal incontinence.骶神经刺激治疗大便失禁的作用机制。
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Aug;13(8):e203-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02623.x.
6
Outcome and management of patients in whom sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence failed.经骶神经刺激治疗失败的粪便失禁患者的结局和处理。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Apr;54(4):425-32. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e318200f866.
7
Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: causes of surgical revision from a series of 87 consecutive patients operated on in a single institution.骶神经刺激治疗大便失禁:单中心 87 例连续手术患者的手术修正原因。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Nov;53(11):1501-7. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181f1cf14.
8
Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: results from a single centre over a 10-year period.骶神经刺激治疗大便失禁:单中心 10 年随访结果。
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Sep;13(9):1030-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02383.x.
9
Sacral nerve stimulation for constipation: suboptimal outcome and adverse events.骶神经刺激治疗便秘:疗效不佳和不良事件。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Jul;53(7):995-9. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181d64207.
10
Infection rates in a large investigational trial of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence.一项大型骶神经刺激治疗粪便失禁的研究中的感染率。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Jul;14(7):1081-9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1177-z. Epub 2010 Mar 31.