Suppr超能文献

线性和弯曲超声探头评估健康受试者和慢性呼吸系统疾病患者股直肌肌肉量的对比研究。

Comparative study of linear and curvilinear ultrasound probes to assess quadriceps rectus femoris muscle mass in healthy subjects and in patients with chronic respiratory disease.

机构信息

Lane Fox Clinical Respiratory Physiology Research Centre, St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Division of Asthma, Allergy and Lung Biology, King's College London, London, UK.

Lane Fox Clinical Respiratory Physiology Research Centre, St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Division of Asthma, Allergy and Lung Biology, King's College London, London, UK; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, National Institute of Health Research Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Respir Res. 2016 Jan 12;3(1):e000103. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2015-000103. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Ultrasound measurements of rectus femoris cross-sectional area (RFCSA) are clinically useful measurements in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and critically ill patients. Technical considerations as to the type of probe used, which affects image resolution, have limited widespread clinical application. We hypothesised that measurement of RFCSA would be similar with linear and curvilinear probes.

METHODS

Four studies were performed to compare the use of the curvilinear probe in measuring RFCSA. Study 1 investigated agreement of RFCSA measurements using linear and curvilinear probes in healthy subjects, and in patients with chronic respiratory disease. Study 2 investigated the intra-rater and inter-rater agreement using the curvilinear probe. Study 3 investigated the agreement of RFCSA measured from whole and spliced images using the linear probe. Study 4 investigated the applicability of ultrasound in measuring RFCSA during the acute and recovery phases of an exacerbation of COPD.

RESULTS

Study 1 showed demonstrated no difference in the measurement of RFCSA using the curvilinear and linear probes (308±104 mm(2) vs 320±117 mm(2), p=0.80; intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)>0.97). Study 2 demonstrated high intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of RFCSA measurement with ICC>0.95 for both. Study 3 showed that the spliced image from the linear probe was similar to the whole image RFCSA (308±103.5 vs 263±147 mm(2), p=0.34; ICC>0.98). Study 4 confirmed the clinical acceptability of using the curvilinear probe during an exacerbation of COPD. There were relationships observed between admission RFCSA and body mass index (r=+0.65, p=0.018), and between RFCSA at admission and physical activity levels at 4 weeks post-hospital discharge (r=+0.75, p=0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

These studies have demonstrated that clinicians can employ whole and spliced images from the linear probe or use images from the curvilinear probe, to measure RFCSA. This will extend the clinical applicability of ultrasound in the measurement of muscle mass in all patient groups.

摘要

引言

股直肌横截面积(RFCSA)的超声测量在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和危重症患者中是一种有用的临床测量方法。探头类型的技术考虑因素,这会影响图像分辨率,限制了其在广泛的临床应用。我们假设 RFCSA 的测量结果与线性和曲线探头相似。

方法

进行了四项研究来比较曲线探头在测量 RFCSA 中的应用。研究 1 调查了健康受试者和慢性呼吸道疾病患者中使用线性和曲线探头测量 RFCSA 的一致性。研究 2 调查了使用曲线探头的内部和外部测量者之间的一致性。研究 3 调查了使用线性探头从全图和拼接图像测量 RFCSA 的一致性。研究 4 调查了超声在 COPD 加重的急性和恢复期测量 RFCSA 的适用性。

结果

研究 1 表明,使用曲线和线性探头测量 RFCSA 没有差异(308±104mm2 与 320±117mm2,p=0.80;组内相关系数(ICC)>0.97)。研究 2 表明,RFCSA 测量的内部和外部观察者之间具有高度的可靠性,ICC 均>0.95。研究 3 表明,线性探头的拼接图像与全图 RFCSA 相似(308±103.5 与 263±147mm2,p=0.34;ICC>0.98)。研究 4 证实了在 COPD 加重期间使用曲线探头的临床可接受性。入院时的 RFCSA 与体重指数(r=+0.65,p=0.018)和出院后 4 周时的体力活动水平(r=+0.75,p=0.006)之间存在相关性。

结论

这些研究表明,临床医生可以使用线性探头的全图和拼接图像或使用曲线探头的图像来测量 RFCSA。这将扩展超声在所有患者群体中测量肌肉量的临床应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73c8/4716191/18d5d72b4165/bmjresp2015000103f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验