Scott N B, Mogensen T, Bigler D, Kehlet H
Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Anaesthesiology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1989 Oct;33(7):535-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1989.tb02961.x.
Twenty patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy were prospectively randomised to receive either intrapleural (bolus 20 ml followed by 10 ml/h) or thoracic epidural (bolus 9 ml followed by 5 ml/h) bupivacaine 0.5% for 8 h postoperatively to assess the effect of these two techniques on pain, pulmonary function and the surgical stress response. As assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS), both groups received good but not total pain relief. Both groups had a 50% reduction in forced expiratory volume (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) after operation, and there was no observed effect on the stress response as measured by plasma glucose and cortisol. It is concluded that while both techniques provide good analgesia, the degree and extent of nerve blockade are not sufficient to affect the afferent neurogenic stimuli responsible for the observed effects on pulmonary function and the stress response.
20例择期行胆囊切除术的患者被前瞻性随机分组,术后8小时分别接受胸膜内(推注20 ml,随后以10 ml/h持续输注)或胸段硬膜外(推注9 ml,随后以5 ml/h持续输注)0.5%布比卡因,以评估这两种技术对疼痛、肺功能和手术应激反应的影响。通过视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估,两组患者均获得了良好但并非完全的疼痛缓解。两组患者术后第1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、用力肺活量(FVC)和呼气峰值流速(PEFR)均下降了50%,且血浆葡萄糖和皮质醇测量的应激反应未观察到影响。结论是,虽然两种技术均提供了良好的镇痛效果,但神经阻滞的程度和范围不足以影响导致观察到的肺功能和应激反应的传入神经源性刺激。