Dave Paresh Vamanrao, Shah Amar Niranjan, Nimavat Pankaj B, Modi Bhavesh B, Pujara Kirit R, Patel Pradip, Mehariya Keshabhai, Rade Kiran Vaman, Shekar Soma, Sachdeva Kuldeep S, Oeltmann John E, Kumar Ajay M V
Department of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
WHO country office for India, New Delhi, India.
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 5;11(2):e0148488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148488. eCollection 2016.
The World Health Organization recommends direct observation of treatment (DOT) to support patients with tuberculosis (TB) and to ensure treatment completion. As per national programme guidelines in India, a DOT provider can be anyone who is acceptable and accessible to the patient and accountable to the health system, except a family member. This poses challenges among children with TB who may be more comfortable receiving medicines from their parents or family members than from unfamiliar DOT providers. We conducted a non-inferiority trial to assess the effect of family DOT on treatment success rates among children with newly diagnosed TB registered for treatment during June-September 2012.
We randomly assigned all districts (n = 30) in Gujarat to the intervention (n = 15) or usual-practice group (n = 15). Adult family members in the intervention districts were given the choice to become their child's DOT provider. DOT was provided by a non-family member in the usual-practice districts. Using routinely collected clinic-based TB treatment cards, we compared treatment success rates (cured and treatment completed) between the two groups and the non-inferiority limit was kept at 5%.
Of 624 children with newly diagnosed TB, 359 (58%) were from intervention districts and 265 (42%) were from usual-practice districts. The two groups were similar with respect to baseline characteristics including age, sex, type of TB, and initial body weight. The treatment success rates were 344 (95.8%) and 247 (93.2%) (p = 0.11) among the intervention and usual-practice groups respectively.
DOT provided by a family member is not inferior to DOT provided by a non-family member among new TB cases in children and can attain international targets for treatment success.
Clinical Trials Registry-India, National Institute of Medical Statistics (Indian Council of Medical Research) CTRI/2015/09/006229.
世界卫生组织建议采用直接观察治疗(DOT)来帮助结核病(TB)患者并确保完成治疗。根据印度国家规划指南,直接观察治疗提供者可以是患者能够接受、方便接触且对卫生系统负责的任何人,但家庭成员除外。这给患结核病的儿童带来了挑战,因为他们从父母或家庭成员那里接受药物可能比从不熟悉的直接观察治疗提供者那里接受药物更自在。我们进行了一项非劣效性试验,以评估2012年6月至9月期间登记接受治疗的新诊断结核病儿童中家庭直接观察治疗对治疗成功率的影响。
我们将古吉拉特邦的所有地区(n = 30)随机分为干预组(n = 15)或常规治疗组(n = 15)。干预地区的成年家庭成员可选择成为其孩子的直接观察治疗提供者。常规治疗地区由非家庭成员提供直接观察治疗。我们使用常规收集的基于诊所的结核病治疗卡,比较了两组的治疗成功率(治愈和完成治疗),非劣效性界限设定为5%。
在624名新诊断的结核病儿童中,359名(58%)来自干预地区,265名(42%)来自常规治疗地区。两组在包括年龄、性别、结核病类型和初始体重等基线特征方面相似。干预组和常规治疗组的治疗成功率分别为344例(95.8%)和247例(93.2%)(p = 0.11)。
在儿童新结核病病例中,家庭成员提供的直接观察治疗并不劣于非家庭成员提供者,并且能够达到治疗成功的国际目标。
印度临床试验注册中心,国家医学统计研究所(印度医学研究理事会)CTRI/2015/09/006229 。