Ahmad S, Dhar M, Mittal G, Bhat N K, Shirazi N, Kalra V, Sati H C, Gupta V
Department of Medicine, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, SRH University, Swami Ram Nagar, Jolly Grant, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, 248106, India.
Department of Microbiology, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, India.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016 Apr;35(4):705-11. doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2590-3. Epub 2016 Feb 6.
Positive serology for dengue and/or scrub typhus infection with/without positive malarial smear (designated as mixed or co-infection) is being increasingly observed during epidemics of acute undifferentiated febrile illnesses (AUFIs). We planned to study the clinical and biochemical spectrum of co-infections with Plasmodium sp., dengue virus and scrub typhus and compare these with mono-infection by the same organisms. During the period from December 2012 to December 2013, all cases presenting with AUFIs to a single medical unit of a referral centre in Garhwal region of the north Indian state of Uttarakhand were retrospectively selected and categorised aetiologically as co-infections, malaria, dengue or scrub typhus. The groups thus created were compared in terms of demographic, clinical, biochemical and outcome parameters. The co-infection group (n = 49) was associated with milder clinical manifestations, fewer, milder and non-progressive organ dysfunction, and lesser need for intensive care, mechanical ventilation and dialysis as compared to mono-infections. When co-infections were sub-grouped and compared with the relevant mono-infections, there were differences in certain haematological and biochemical parameters; however, this difference did not translate into differential outcomes. Scrub typhus mono-infection was associated with severe disease in terms of both morbidity and mortality. Malaria, dengue and scrub typhus should be routinely tested in all patients with AUFIs. Co-infections, whether true or due to serological cross-reactivity, appear to be a separate entity so far as presentation and morbidity is concerned. Further insight is needed into the mechanism and identification of the protective infection.
在急性未分化发热性疾病(AUFIs)流行期间,越来越多地观察到登革热和/或恙虫病感染血清学呈阳性,无论疟原虫涂片是否呈阳性(称为混合感染或合并感染)。我们计划研究疟原虫、登革热病毒和恙虫病合并感染的临床和生化特征,并将其与相同病原体的单一感染进行比较。在2012年12月至2013年12月期间,回顾性选取了印度北部北阿坎德邦加瓦尔地区一家转诊中心的单个医疗单元中所有出现AUFIs的病例,并根据病因将其分类为合并感染、疟疾、登革热或恙虫病。对由此形成的各组在人口统计学、临床、生化和结局参数方面进行比较。与单一感染相比,合并感染组(n = 49)的临床表现较轻,器官功能障碍较少、较轻且无进展,对重症监护、机械通气和透析的需求也较少。当将合并感染进行亚组划分并与相关的单一感染进行比较时,某些血液学和生化参数存在差异;然而,这种差异并未转化为不同的结局。就发病率和死亡率而言,恙虫病单一感染与严重疾病相关。所有AUFIs患者均应常规检测疟疾、登革热和恙虫病。就临床表现和发病率而言,合并感染,无论其是真正的合并感染还是由于血清学交叉反应所致,似乎都是一个独立的实体。需要进一步深入了解保护性感染的机制和识别方法。