Willmott A G B, Gibson O R, Hayes M, Maxwell N S
Centre of Sport and Exercise Science and Medicine (SESAME), Environmental Extremes Laboratory, School of Sport and Service Management, University of Brighton, Eastbourne, UK.
Centre of Sport and Exercise Science and Medicine (SESAME), Environmental Extremes Laboratory, School of Sport and Service Management, University of Brighton, Eastbourne, UK; Centre for Sports Medicine and Human Performance (CSMHP), Brunel University, London, UK.
J Therm Biol. 2016 Feb;56:59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
Endurance performances are impaired under conditions of elevated heat stress. Short term heat acclimation (STHA) over 4-6 days can evoke rapid adaptation, which mitigate decrements in performance and alleviate heat strain. This study investigated the efficacy of twice daily heat acclimation (TDHA) compared to single session per day heat acclimation (SDHA) and normothermic training, at inducing heat acclimation phenotype and its impact upon running performance in hot, humid conditions. Twenty one, moderately trained males were matched and assigned to three groups; SDHA (mean±SD) (peak oxygen consumption [V̇O2peak] 45.8±6.1mLkg(-1)min(-1), body mass 81.3±16.0kg, stature 182±3cm), TDHA (46.1±7.0mLkg(-1)min(-1), 80.1±11.9kg, 178±4cm) or control (CON) (47.1±3.5mLkg(-1)min(-1), 78.6±16.7kg, 178±4cm). Interventions consisted of 45min cycling at 50% V̇O2peak, once daily for 4d (SDHA) and twice daily for 2d (TDHA), in 35°C, 60% relative humidity (RH), and once daily for 4 days (CON) in 21°C, 40% RH. Participants completed a pre- and post-intervention 5km treadmill run trial in 30°C, 60% RH, where the first 2km were fixed at 40% V̇O2peak and the final 3km was self-paced. No statistically significant interaction effects occurred within- or between-groups over the 2-4 days intervention. While within-group differences were found in physiological and perceptual measures during the fixed intensity trial post-intervention, they did not statistically differ between-groups. Similarly, TDHA (-36±34s [+3.5%]) and SDHA (-26±28s [+2.8%]) groups improved 3km performances (p=0.35), but did not differ from CON (-6±44s [+0.6%]). This is the first study to investigate the effects of HA twice daily and compare it with traditional single session per day STHA. These STHA protocols may have the ability to induce partial adaptive responses to heat stress and possibly enhance performance in environmentally challenging conditions, however, future development is warranted to optimise the administration to provide a potent stimuli for heat adaptation in athletic and military personnel within a rapid regime.
在热应激升高的情况下,耐力表现会受到损害。4至6天的短期热适应(STHA)可引发快速适应,减轻表现下降并缓解热应激。本研究调查了每日两次热适应(TDHA)与每日一次热适应(SDHA)和常温训练相比,在诱导热适应表型及其对炎热潮湿条件下跑步表现的影响方面的效果。21名训练有素的男性被匹配并分为三组;SDHA(平均值±标准差)(峰值耗氧量[V̇O2peak] 45.8±6.1mLkg(-1)min(-1),体重81.3±16.0kg,身高182±3cm),TDHA(46.1±7.0mLkg(-1)min(-1),80.1±11.9kg,178±4cm)或对照组(CON)(47.1±3.5mLkg(-1)min(-1),78.6±16.7kg,178±4cm)。干预措施包括在35°C、相对湿度(RH)60%的条件下,以50% V̇O2peak进行45分钟的骑行,SDHA组每天一次,共4天,TDHA组每天两次,共2天,CON组在21°C、40% RH的条件下每天一次,共4天。参与者在30°C、60% RH的条件下完成了干预前和干预后的5公里跑步机跑步试验,前2公里固定在40% V̇O2peak,最后3公里由参与者自行 pace。在2至4天的干预期间,组内或组间均未出现统计学上显著的交互作用。虽然在干预后的固定强度试验中,组内生理和感知测量存在差异,但组间在统计学上并无差异。同样,TDHA组(-36±34秒[+3.5%])和SDHA组(-26±28秒[+2.8%])的3公里表现有所改善(p = 0.35),但与CON组(-6±44秒[+0.6%])并无差异。这是第一项研究每日两次热适应效果并将其与传统的每日一次短期热适应进行比较的研究。这些短期热适应方案可能有能力诱导对热应激的部分适应性反应,并可能在环境具有挑战性的条件下提高表现,然而,未来仍需进一步发展以优化给药方式,以便在快速的方案中为运动员和军事人员提供强大的热适应刺激。