Guse Jennifer, Schweigert Eva, Kulms Gerhild, Heinen Ines, Martens Claudia, Guse Andreas H
Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Dean's Office of Education and Students' Affairs, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 9;11(2):e0147444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147444. eCollection 2016.
Choosing the right mentor is crucial for effective mentorship. Yet, many medical students have difficulties finding a suitable mentor. Thus we developed mentoring speed dating (MSD) as a promising matching tool to connect students and faculty mentors successfully. The purpose of this study was to explore mentees' and mentors' experience with MSD and investigate the impact of MSD on the perceived mentorship quality and continuance of the mentoring relationship.
The authors completed a mixed methods study at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany, between June 2011 and March 2014. They conducted four focus groups with mentees and mentors who participated in a mentoring speed dating event and analyzed transcripts using conventional content analysis with inductive categorizing. In addition, three mentoring cohorts (two matched via MSD, one matched via conventional online profiles) were surveyed on mentorship satisfaction and the 1-year continuance of their mentorship was monitored. Fifteen mentees and fifteen mentors participated in the focus groups. The authors identified several themes such as short and long term benefits of MSD and fulfillment of expectations. Benefits included finding out about the personal connection, matching expectations, providing an efficient overview of candidates. The survey was completed by 93 students (n = 29 without MSD; n = 64 with MSD). Independent t-tests and multivariate analysis of variance were used to analyze the impact of MSD on student's mentorship satisfaction.
There were significant differences in responses to the items "Commitment of mentor" (p = .019) and "Constructive feedback" (p = .038) among the students who attended MSD and the students without MSD. After one year far more mentoring relationships existed among those mentees who participated in MSD in comparison to the "no MSD group".
MSD is a valuable matching tool with beneficial effects on the mentorship quality. It enhances essential factors in the mentoring relationship such as commitment and satisfaction.
选择合适的导师对于有效的师徒指导关系至关重要。然而,许多医学生在寻找合适的导师时遇到困难。因此,我们开发了师徒速配(MSD)作为一种有前景的匹配工具,以成功地将学生与教师导师联系起来。本研究的目的是探讨学员和导师对MSD的体验,并调查MSD对感知到的师徒指导质量和师徒关系持续性的影响。
作者于2011年6月至2014年3月在德国汉堡-埃彭多夫大学医学中心完成了一项混合方法研究。他们对参加师徒速配活动的学员和导师进行了四个焦点小组访谈,并使用传统内容分析法和归纳分类法分析访谈记录。此外,对三个师徒指导群组(两个通过MSD匹配,一个通过传统在线资料匹配)进行了师徒指导满意度调查,并监测了他们师徒关系的一年持续性。15名学员和15名导师参加了焦点小组访谈。作者确定了几个主题,如MSD的短期和长期益处以及期望的达成。益处包括发现个人联系、匹配期望、提供候选人的有效概述。93名学生完成了调查(n = 29名未参加MSD;n = 64名参加MSD)。使用独立t检验和多变量方差分析来分析MSD对学生师徒指导满意度的影响。
参加MSD的学生和未参加MSD的学生在“导师的投入”(p = .019)和“建设性反馈”(p = .038)项目的回答上存在显著差异。一年后,与“未参加MSD组”相比,参加MSD的学员之间存在更多的师徒关系。
MSD是一种有价值的匹配工具,对师徒指导质量有有益影响。它增强了师徒关系中的关键因素,如投入和满意度。