Center for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
JMIR Ment Health. 2016 Feb 9;3(1):e9. doi: 10.2196/mental.4534.
Blended care, a combination of online and face-to-face therapy, is increasingly being applied in mental health care to obtain optimal benefit from the advantages these two treatment modalities have. Promising results have been reported, but a variety in descriptions and ways of operationalizing blended care exists. Currently, what type of "blend" works for whom, and why, is unclear. Furthermore, a rationale for setting up blended care is often lacking. In this viewpoint paper, we describe postulates for blended care and provide an instrument (Fit for Blended Care) that aims to assist therapists and patients whether and how to set up blended care treatment. A review of the literature, two focus groups (n=5 and n=5), interviews with therapists (n=14), and interviews with clients (n=2) were conducted to develop postulates of eHealth and blended care and an instrument to assist therapists and clients in setting up optimal blended care. Important postulates for blended care are the notion that both treatment modalities should complement each other and that set up of blended treatment should be based on shared decision making between patient and therapist. The "Fit for Blended Care" instrument is presented which addresses the following relevant themes: possible barriers to receiving blended treatment such as the risk of crisis, issues in communication (at a distance), as well as possible facilitators such as social support. More research into the reasons why and for whom blended care works is needed. To benefit from blended care, face-to-face and online care should be combined in such way that the potentials of both treatment modalities are used optimally, depending on patient abilities, needs, and preferences. To facilitate the process of setting up a personalized blended treatment, the Fit for Blended Care instrument can be used. By applying this approach in research and practice, more insight into the working mechanisms and optimal (personal) "blends" of online and face-to-face therapy becomes within reach.
混合式照护,即线上和线下治疗的结合,正在越来越多地应用于精神卫生保健中,以从这两种治疗模式的优势中获得最佳获益。已经有报道称其具有良好的效果,但混合式照护的描述和实施方式多种多样。目前,哪种“混合”对谁有效,以及为什么有效尚不清楚。此外,混合式照护的设置依据也往往缺乏。在这篇观点文章中,我们描述了混合式照护的假设,并提供了一种工具(混合式照护适宜性评估),旨在帮助治疗师和患者确定是否以及如何开展混合式照护治疗。我们对文献进行了回顾,开展了 2 个焦点小组(n=5 和 n=5)、对治疗师(n=14)进行了访谈、对患者(n=2)进行了访谈,以制定电子健康和混合式照护的假设,并开发一种工具来帮助治疗师和患者设置最佳的混合式照护。混合式照护的重要假设是,两种治疗模式应该相辅相成,并且混合治疗的设置应该基于患者和治疗师之间的共同决策。我们提出了“混合式照护适宜性评估”工具,该工具涉及以下相关主题:接受混合式治疗的可能障碍,如危机风险、远程沟通问题,以及可能的促进因素,如社会支持。需要进一步研究混合式照护有效的原因和对象。为了从混合式照护中获益,应将面对面和在线护理结合起来,根据患者的能力、需求和偏好,以最佳方式利用两种治疗模式的潜力。为了促进个性化混合式治疗方案的设置过程,可以使用混合式照护适宜性评估工具。通过在研究和实践中应用这种方法,可以更深入地了解在线和面对面治疗的工作机制以及最佳(个性化)“混合”。