Russell Catherine Georgina, Taki Sarah, Laws Rachel, Azadi Leva, Campbell Karen J, Elliott Rosalind, Lynch John, Ball Kylie, Taylor Rachael, Denney-Wilson Elizabeth
Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Centre for Obesity Management and Prevention Research Excellence in Primary Health Care (COMPaREPHC), Sydney, Australia.
BMC Public Health. 2016 Feb 13;16:151. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2801-y.
Despite the crucial need to develop targeted and effective approaches for obesity prevention in children most at risk, the pathways explaining socioeconomic disparity in children's obesity prevalence remain poorly understood.
We conducted a systematic review of the literature that investigated causes of weight gain in children aged 0-5 years from socioeconomically disadvantaged or Indigenous backgrounds residing in OECD countries. Major electronic databases were searched from inception until December 2015. Key words identified studies addressing relationships between parenting, child eating, child physical activity or sedentary behaviour and child weight in disadvantaged samples.
A total of 32 articles met the inclusion criteria. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool quality rating for the studies ranged from 25 % (weak) to 100 % (strong). Studies predominantly reported on relationships between parenting and child weight (n = 21), or parenting and child eating (n = 12), with fewer (n = 8) investigating child eating and weight. Most evidence was from socio-economically disadvantaged ethnic minority groups in the USA. Clustering of diet, weight and feeding behaviours by socioeconomic indicators and ethnicity precluded identification of independent effects of each of these risk factors.
This review has highlighted significant gaps in our mechanistic understanding of the relative importance of different aspects of parent and child behaviours in disadvantaged population groups.
尽管迫切需要为肥胖风险最高的儿童制定有针对性且有效的预防方法,但对于儿童肥胖患病率存在社会经济差异的原因,人们仍知之甚少。
我们对文献进行了系统回顾,研究对象为经济社会地位不利或来自原住民背景的0至5岁儿童体重增加的原因,这些儿童居住在经合组织国家。从数据库建立之初至2015年12月,我们检索了主要的电子数据库。关键词用于确定那些研究弱势样本中育儿方式、儿童饮食、儿童身体活动或久坐行为与儿童体重之间关系的研究。
共有32篇文章符合纳入标准。这些研究在混合方法评估工具上的质量评分从25%(弱)到100%(强)不等。研究主要报告了育儿方式与儿童体重之间的关系(n = 21),或育儿方式与儿童饮食之间的关系(n = 12),而较少研究儿童饮食与体重之间的关系(n = 8)。大多数证据来自美国社会经济地位不利的少数族裔群体。社会经济指标和种族对饮食、体重和喂养行为的聚类使得无法确定这些风险因素各自的独立影响。
本综述突出了我们在理解弱势人群中父母和儿童行为不同方面相对重要性的机制方面存在的重大差距。