Fishman Elliot, Schepers Paul
Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Institute for Sensible Transport, Fitzroy, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, Rijswijk, The Netherlands.
J Safety Res. 2016 Feb;56:41-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
Bike share has emerged as a rapidly growing mode of transport in over 800 cities globally, up from just a handful in the 1990s. Some analysts had forecast a rise in the number of bicycle crashes after the introduction of bike share, but empirical research on bike share safety is rare. The goal of this study is to examine the impact of bike share programs on cycling safety.
The paper has two substudies. Study 1 was a secondary analysis of longitudinal hospital injury data from the Graves et al. (2014) study. It compared cycling safety in cities that introduced bike share programs with cities that did not. Study 2 combined ridership data with crash data of selected North American and European cities to compare bike share users to other cyclists.
Study 1 indicated that the introduction of a bike share system was associated with a reduction in cycling injury risk. Study 2 found that bike share users were less likely than other cyclists to sustain fatal or severe injuries.
On a per kilometer basis, bike share is associated with decreased risk of both fatal and non-fatal bicycle crashes when compared to private bike riding.
The results of this study suggest that concerns of decreased levels of cycling safety are unjustified and should not prevent decision makers from introducing public bike share schemes, especially if combined with other safety measures like traffic calming.
共享单车已成为全球800多个城市中迅速发展的一种交通方式,而在20世纪90年代时仅有少数几个城市有共享单车。一些分析人士曾预测,共享单车推出后自行车碰撞事故数量会上升,但关于共享单车安全性的实证研究却很少。本研究的目的是考察共享单车项目对骑行安全的影响。
本文有两项子研究。研究1是对格雷夫斯等人(2014年)研究中的纵向医院伤害数据进行二次分析。它比较了引入共享单车项目的城市与未引入该项目的城市的骑行安全性。研究2将选定的北美和欧洲城市的骑行数据与碰撞数据相结合,以比较共享单车使用者与其他骑行者。
研究1表明,引入共享单车系统与骑行伤害风险的降低有关。研究2发现,共享单车使用者比其他骑行者遭受致命或重伤的可能性更小。
与私人骑行相比,按每公里计算,共享单车与致命和非致命自行车碰撞事故风险的降低有关。
本研究结果表明,对骑行安全水平下降的担忧是没有道理的,不应阻止决策者引入公共共享单车计划,特别是如果与交通稳静化等其他安全措施相结合的话。