Ahrari Farzaneh, Akbari Majid, Mohammadpour Sakineh, Forghani Maryam
Dental Research Center, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Dental Research Center, Department of Operative dentistry, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Laser Ther. 2015 Dec 30;24(4):257-64. doi: 10.5978/islsm.15-OR-15.
This study investigated the effectiveness of laser-assisted in-office bleaching and home-bleaching in sound and demineralized enamel.
The sample consisted of 120 freshly-extracted bovine incisors. Half of the specimens were stored in a demineralizing solution to induce white spot lesions. Following exposure to a tea solution for 7.5 days, the specimens were randomly assigned to 4 groups of 30 according to the type of enamel and the bleaching procedure employed. Groups 1 and 2 consisted of demineralized teeth subjected to in-office bleaching and home bleaching, whereas in groups 3 and 4, sound teeth were subjected to in-office and home bleaching, respectively. A diode laser (810 nm, 2 W, continuous wave, four times for 15 seconds each) was employed for assisting the in-office process. The color of the specimens was measured before (T1) and after (T2) staining and during (T3) and after (T4) the bleaching procedures using a spectrophotometer. The color change (ΔE) between different treatments stages was compared among the groups.
There were significant differences in the color change between T2 and T3 (ΔE T2-T3) and T2 and T4 (ΔE T2-T4) stages among the study groups (p<0.05). Pairwise comparison by Duncan test revealed that both ΔET2-T3 and ΔET2-T4 were significantly greater in demineralized teeth submitted to laser-assisted in-office bleaching (group 1) as compared to the other groups (P< 0.05).
Laser-assisted in-office bleaching could provide faster and greater whitening effect than home bleaching on stained demineralized enamel, but both procedures produced comparable results on sound teeth.
本研究调查了激光辅助诊室漂白和家庭漂白对健康釉质和脱矿釉质的效果。
样本包括120颗新鲜拔除的牛切牙。将一半标本储存在脱矿溶液中以诱导白斑病变。在暴露于茶溶液7.5天后,根据釉质类型和采用的漂白程序,将标本随机分为4组,每组30颗。第1组和第2组由接受诊室漂白和家庭漂白的脱矿牙齿组成,而第3组和第4组中,健康牙齿分别接受诊室漂白和家庭漂白。使用二极管激光(810 nm,2 W,连续波,每次15秒,共4次)辅助诊室漂白过程。在染色前(T1)和染色后(T2)以及漂白过程中(T3)和漂白后(T4)使用分光光度计测量标本的颜色。比较各组不同治疗阶段之间的颜色变化(ΔE)。
研究组之间在T2和T3阶段(ΔE T2-T3)以及T2和T4阶段(ΔE T2-T4)的颜色变化存在显著差异(p<0.05)。通过邓肯检验进行的两两比较显示,与其他组相比,接受激光辅助诊室漂白的脱矿牙齿(第1组)的ΔET2-T3和ΔET2-T4均显著更大(P<0.05)。
对于染色的脱矿釉质,激光辅助诊室漂白比家庭漂白能提供更快、更显著的美白效果,但两种方法对健康牙齿产生的效果相当。