Hemmati Mohammad Ali, Vafaee Fariborz, Allahbakhshi Hanif
Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahed University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Assistant Professor, Dental Research Center, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
J Dent (Tehran). 2015 Jul;12(7):478-84.
The aim of this study was to assess and compare the water sorption and flexural strength of thermoplastic and conventional acrylic resins.
Water sorption and flexural strength were compared between a thermoplastic modified polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) denture base resin (group A) and a heat-polymerized PMMA acrylic resin (group B) as the control group (n=10). A three-point bending test was carried out for flexural strength testing. For water sorption test, 10 disc-shaped samples were prepared. After desiccating, the samples were weighed and immersed in distilled water for seven days. Then, they were weighed again, and desiccated for the second and third times. Differences between the mean values in the two groups were analyzed using Student's t-test.
The mean value of water sorption was 14.74±1.36 μg/mm(3) in group A, and 19.11±0.90 μg/mm(3) in group B; this difference was statistically significant (P< 0.001). The mean value of flexural strength was 88.21±8.63 MPa in group A and 77.77±9.49 MPa in group B. A significant difference was observed between the two groups (P= 0.019).
Flexural strength of group A was significantly higher than that of group B, and its water sorption was significantly lower. Thus, thermoplastic resins can be a suitable alternative to conventional PMMA acrylic resins as denture base materials.
本研究旨在评估和比较热塑性树脂与传统丙烯酸树脂的吸水性和弯曲强度。
比较热塑性改性聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)义齿基托树脂(A组)与热聚合PMMA丙烯酸树脂(B组,作为对照组,n = 10)的吸水性和弯曲强度。进行三点弯曲试验以测试弯曲强度。对于吸水性试验,制备10个圆盘形样品。干燥后,对样品称重并浸入蒸馏水中7天。然后再次称重,并进行第二次和第三次干燥。使用学生t检验分析两组平均值之间的差异。
A组的平均吸水量为14.74±1.36μg/mm³,B组为19.11±0.90μg/mm³;此差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。A组的弯曲强度平均值为88.21±8.63MPa,B组为77.77±9.49MPa。两组之间观察到显著差异(P = 0.019)。
A组的弯曲强度明显高于B组,其吸水量明显更低。因此,热塑性树脂可作为传统PMMA丙烯酸树脂作为义齿基托材料的合适替代品。