Hedén Per, Sarfati Isabelle, Clough Krishna, Olenius Michael, Sellman Gabriella, Trevidic Patrick
Akademikliniken, Stockholm, Sweden; L'Insitut du Sein-Paris Breast Center, Paris, France; ProForma Clinic, Stockholm, Sweden; Plastikkirurggruppen, Stockholm, Sweden; and Expert2Expert Group, Paris, France.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Jan 7;3(12):e575. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000554. eCollection 2015 Dec.
Long-term follow-up data following 2 breast enhancement treatments with stabilized hyaluronic acid (HA) gel are limited. Although HA gel is no longer marketed for breast enhancement, there is a clinical need for information about follow-up of previously treated women. A multicenter, noncomparative study was conducted in women seeking breast enhancement. Subjects received 1 treatment of HA gel (maximum, 100 mL/breast); a subgroup underwent retreatment 9 months later. Follow-up was conducted for 24 months after last treatment; endpoints included magnetic resonance imaging for estimation of gel degradation, adverse events, breast examinations, Global Esthetic Improvement Scale, and satisfaction ratings. Seventy-one subjects received 1 treatment, with 22 (31%) receiving retreatment after 9 months. Twenty-four months after last treatment, the mean percentage of remaining gel was 17% in the single-treatment group and 21% in the retreatment group; complete degradation had not occurred in any subject. The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events were implant-site nodules, medical device implantation events, capsular contracture associated with breast implant, and injection-site nodules; most were mild to moderate and required no intervention. Based on subject Global Esthetic Improvement Scale ratings, 36% of breasts in the single- treatment group and 50% of breasts in the retreatment group were improved 24 months after last treatment, but subject satisfaction had returned to baseline levels. Some gel remained in all subjects 24 months after last treatment. Although single treatment and retreatment were generally well tolerated, physicians need to be aware of common treatment-related complications to manage them adequately.
关于使用稳定透明质酸(HA)凝胶进行两次隆乳治疗后的长期随访数据有限。尽管HA凝胶已不再用于隆乳市场,但临床上仍需要了解既往接受治疗女性的随访信息。对寻求隆乳的女性进行了一项多中心、非对照研究。受试者接受1次HA凝胶治疗(最大剂量,每侧乳房100 mL);一个亚组在9个月后接受再次治疗。在最后一次治疗后进行24个月的随访;终点指标包括用于评估凝胶降解情况的磁共振成像、不良事件、乳房检查、全球美学改善量表以及满意度评分。71名受试者接受了1次治疗,其中22名(31%)在9个月后接受了再次治疗。最后一次治疗24个月后,单次治疗组剩余凝胶的平均百分比为17%,再次治疗组为21%;没有任何受试者出现完全降解。最常报告的与治疗相关的不良事件是植入部位结节、医疗器械植入事件、与乳房植入物相关的包膜挛缩以及注射部位结节;大多数为轻度至中度,无需干预。根据受试者的全球美学改善量表评分,单次治疗组36%的乳房和再次治疗组50%的乳房在最后一次治疗24个月后得到改善,但受试者满意度已恢复到基线水平。最后一次治疗24个月后,所有受试者体内仍有一些凝胶残留。尽管单次治疗和再次治疗一般耐受性良好,但医生需要了解常见的与治疗相关的并发症,以便进行充分管理。