Tae Kyung, Song Chang Myeon, Ji Yong Bae, Sung Eui Suk, Jeong Jin Hyeok, Kim Dong Sun
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 133-792, Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4785-4792. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4808-y. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
The oncologic outcome of robotic thyroidectomy is not yet well established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the recurrence rate after robotic thyroidectomy in comparison with conventional thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC).
We analyzed 896 patients with PTC who either underwent robotic (212 patients using a gasless unilateral axillary or an axillo-breast approach) or conventional cervical thyroidectomy (684 patients) with/without central neck dissection between October 2008 and February 2014. We excluded patients who underwent concomitant lateral neck dissection or completion thyroidectomy, and cases with T4 tumor, tumor lager than 4 cm, other types of thyroid cancer, recurrent cancer, and distant metastasis. A propensity score matching analysis was done with ten covariates including age, gender, body mass index, tumor size, multifocality, bilaterality, extrathyroidal extension, type of thyroidectomy, extent of central neck dissection, and RAI ablation to reduce selection bias.
In baseline data, the male ratio and the mean age were lower in the robotic group. Stage, multifocality, and bilaterality were higher in the conventional group. The rate of total thyroidectomy was higher in the conventional group. The two matched groups of each 185 patients were produced and well balanced by propensity score matching. In the comparison of propensity score matched groups, operative time was longer in the robotic group (P < 0.001), and postoperative complications did not differ between the two groups, except for transient hypoparathyroidism and formation of seroma. The recurrence rate did not differ between the two groups after a mean follow-up of 43.6 months (0.5 and 1.1 % in the robotic and conventional groups, respectively, P = 0.375).
The oncologic outcome of robotic thyroidectomy in 5-year experience is comparable to that of conventional thyroidectomy in selected patients with PTC.
机器人甲状腺切除术的肿瘤学结局尚未完全明确。本研究旨在评估机器人甲状腺切除术与传统甲状腺切除术治疗甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)后的复发率。
我们分析了2008年10月至2014年2月期间接受机器人手术(212例采用无气单侧腋窝或腋窝-乳房入路)或传统颈部甲状腺切除术(684例)并伴有或不伴有中央区淋巴结清扫的896例PTC患者。我们排除了接受同期侧方淋巴结清扫或再次甲状腺切除术的患者,以及T4期肿瘤、肿瘤直径大于4cm、其他类型甲状腺癌、复发性癌和远处转移的病例。采用倾向评分匹配分析,纳入年龄、性别、体重指数、肿瘤大小、多灶性、双侧性、甲状腺外侵犯、甲状腺切除术类型、中央区淋巴结清扫范围和放射性碘消融等10个协变量,以减少选择偏倚。
在基线数据中,机器人手术组的男性比例和平均年龄较低。传统手术组的分期、多灶性和双侧性较高。传统手术组的全甲状腺切除术率较高。通过倾向评分匹配,产生了每组185例患者的两个匹配组,且两组均衡性良好。在倾向评分匹配组的比较中,机器人手术组的手术时间较长(P<0.001),除短暂性甲状旁腺功能减退和血清肿形成外,两组术后并发症无差异。平均随访43.6个月后,两组的复发率无差异(机器人手术组和传统手术组分别为0.5%和1.1%,P=0.375)。
在5年的经验中,机器人甲状腺切除术在特定PTC患者中的肿瘤学结局与传统甲状腺切除术相当。