Leonardi Dutra Kamile, Haas Letícia, Porporatti André Luís, Flores-Mir Carlos, Nascimento Santos Juliana, Mezzomo Luis André, Corrêa Márcio, De Luca Canto Graziela
Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
J Endod. 2016 Mar;42(3):356-64. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.12.015.
Endodontic diagnosis depends on accurate radiographic examination. Assessment of the location and extent of apical periodontitis (AP) can influence treatment planning and subsequent treatment outcomes. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the diagnostic accuracy of conventional radiography and cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging on the discrimination of AP from no lesion.
Eight electronic databases with no language or time limitations were searched. Articles in which the primary objective was to evaluate the accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of any type of radiographic technique to assess AP in humans were selected. The gold standard was the histologic examination for actual AP (in vivo) or in situ visualization of bone defects for induced artificial AP (in vitro). Accuracy measurements described in the studies were transformed to construct receiver operating characteristic curves and forest plots with the aid of Review Manager v.5.2 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark) and MetaDisc v.1.4. software (Unit of Clinical Biostatistics Team of the Ramón y Cajal Hospital, Madrid, Spain). The methodology of the selected studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2.
Only 9 studies met the inclusion criteria and were subjected to a qualitative analysis. A meta-analysis was conducted on 6 of these articles. All of these articles studied artificial AP with induced bone defects. The accuracy values (area under the curve) were 0.96 for CBCT imaging, 0.73 for conventional periapical radiography, and 0.72 for digital periapical radiography. No evidence was found for panoramic radiography.
Periapical radiographs (digital and conventional) reported good diagnostic accuracy on the discrimination of artificial AP from no lesions, whereas CBCT imaging showed excellent accuracy values.
牙髓病诊断依赖于精确的影像学检查。根尖周炎(AP)位置和范围的评估会影响治疗计划及后续治疗结果。因此,本系统评价和荟萃分析评估了传统X线摄影和锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)成像在鉴别有无AP方面的诊断准确性。
检索8个无语言或时间限制的电子数据库。选取主要目的为评估任何类型影像学技术评估人类AP准确性(敏感性和特异性)的文章。金标准为实际AP(体内)的组织学检查或诱导性人工AP(体外)骨缺损的原位可视化。借助Review Manager v.5.2(丹麦哥本哈根北欧 Cochrane 中心)和MetaDisc v.1.4软件(西班牙马德里拉蒙·y·卡哈尔医院临床生物统计学团队),将研究中描述的准确性测量值进行转换,以构建受试者工作特征曲线和森林图。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估工具-2对所选研究的方法进行评估。
仅9项研究符合纳入标准并进行了定性分析。对其中6篇文章进行了荟萃分析。所有这些文章均研究了诱导性骨缺损的人工AP。CBCT成像的准确性值(曲线下面积)为0.96,传统根尖片为0.73,数字根尖片为0.72。未发现全景片的相关证据。
根尖片(数字和传统)在鉴别有无人工AP方面具有良好的诊断准确性,而CBCT成像显示出优异的准确性值。