Suppr超能文献

评估英国城市固体废物能源回收的环境可持续性。

Assessing the environmental sustainability of energy recovery from municipal solid waste in the UK.

机构信息

School of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Science, C16, The Mill, Sackville Street, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.

School of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Science, C16, The Mill, Sackville Street, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2016 Apr;50:346-63. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.02.010. Epub 2016 Feb 20.

Abstract

Even though landfilling of waste is the least favourable option in the waste management hierarchy, the majority of municipal solid waste (MSW) in many countries is still landfilled. This represents waste of valuable resources and could lead to higher environmental impacts compared to energy recovered by incineration, even if the landfill gas is recovered. Using life cycle assessment (LCA) as a tool, this paper aims to find out which of the following two options for MSW disposal is more environmentally sustainable: incineration or recovery of biogas from landfills, each producing either electricity or co-generating heat and electricity. The systems are compared on a life cycle basis for two functional units: 'disposal of 1 tonne of MSW' and 'generation of 1 kWh of electricity'. The results indicate that, if both systems are credited for their respective recovered energy and recyclable materials, energy from incineration has much lower impacts than from landfill biogas across all impact categories, except for human toxicity. The impacts of incineration co-generating heat and electricity are negative for nine out of 11 categories as the avoided impacts for the recovered energy and materials are higher than those caused by incineration. By improving the recovery rate of biogas, some impacts of landfilling, such as global warming, depletion of fossil resources, acidification and photochemical smog, would be significantly reduced. However, most impacts of the landfill gas would still be higher than the impacts of incineration, except for global warming and human toxicity. The analysis on the basis of net electricity produced shows that the LCA impacts of electricity from incineration are several times lower in comparison to the impacts of electricity from landfill biogas. Electricity from incineration has significantly lower global warming and several other impacts than electricity from coal and oil but has higher impacts than electricity from natural gas or UK grid. At the UK level, diverting all MSW currently landfilled to incineration with energy recovery would not only avoid the environmental impacts associated with landfilling but, under the current assumptions, would also meet 2.3% of UK's electricity demand and save 2-2.6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions per year.

摘要

尽管垃圾填埋是废物管理层次结构中最不理想的选择,但在许多国家,大部分城市固体废物(MSW)仍被填埋。这不仅浪费了宝贵的资源,而且与通过焚烧回收能源相比,即使回收了垃圾填埋气,也可能导致更高的环境影响。本文使用生命周期评估(LCA)作为工具,旨在找出以下两种 MSW 处理方式中哪一种更具环境可持续性:焚烧或从垃圾填埋场回收沼气,每种方式都可产生电力或热电联产。在两个功能单位的基础上对系统进行生命周期比较:“处理 1 吨 MSW”和“产生 1 千瓦时电力”。结果表明,如果两个系统都因各自回收的能源和可回收材料而获得信贷,那么在所有影响类别中,除人类毒性外,焚烧产生的能源对环境的影响远低于垃圾填埋沼气。由于回收的能源和材料避免的影响高于焚烧造成的影响,因此,焚烧热电联产的影响在 11 个类别中有 9 个是负面的。通过提高沼气的回收率,可以显著降低一些垃圾填埋的影响,如全球变暖、化石资源枯竭、酸化和光化学烟雾。然而,除了全球变暖、人类毒性外,垃圾填埋气的大部分影响仍将高于焚烧的影响。基于净发电量的分析表明,与来自垃圾填埋沼气的电力相比,焚烧产生的电力的 LCA 影响要低几个数量级。与来自煤炭和石油的电力相比,来自焚烧的电力具有显著更低的全球变暖影响和其他一些影响,但比来自天然气或英国电网的电力影响更大。在英国,将目前所有被填埋的 MSW 都转移到焚烧厂进行能量回收,不仅可以避免与填埋相关的环境影响,而且根据目前的假设,还可以满足英国 2.3%的电力需求,并每年节省 200 万至 260 万吨温室气体排放。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验