Olanrewaju H A, Miller W W, Maslin W R, Collier S D, Purswell J L, Branton S L
USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Poultry Research Unit, PO Box 5367, Mississippi State University, Starkville 39762-5367
Advanced Animal Eye Care, 1067 Old West Point Road, Starkville, MS 39759.
Poult Sci. 2016 Apr;95(4):727-35. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev360. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
This study investigated the effects of light sources and light intensity on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and welfare indices of heavy broilers (>3.0 kg) in 4 trials with 2 replications per trial. A total of 960 one-day-old Ross×Ross 708 chicks (30 males/30 females/room) were randomly distributed into 16 environmentally controlled rooms at 50% RH. A 4×2 factorial treatment structure evaluated 4 light sources (incandescent [ICD, standard], compact fluorescent [CFL], neutral light emitting diode [Neutral-LED], and cool poultry specific filtered LED [Cool-PSF-LED]) and 2 levels (5 lx, 20 lx) of light intensities. Each of the 4 light sources was paired with one of the 2 light intensities. Birds were fed the same diet with a 4-phase feeding program (starter, grower, finisher, and withdrawal). Feed and water were provided ad libitum. Birds and feed were weighed on one, 14, 21, 28, 42, and 56 d of age for growth performance. All mortality was recorded daily and feed conversion was adjusted for mortality. Immune response was determined on d 28 to d 35, whereas other welfare indices were performed on d 42 and 49, respectively. At d 56 of each trial, 20 (10 males and 10 females) birds from each room were processed to determine weights and yields. The BW, BW gain, live weight, and carcass weights of birds reared under Cool-PSF-LED were different (P≤0.05) in comparison to birds reared under ICD. However, FI, FCR, and mortality were not affected by treatments. There was no effect of treatments on fat or breast and tender weights and yields. In addition, there was no effect of treatments on ocular development, immune response, and other welfare indices, suggesting that the light sources evaluated did not compromise welfare of heavy broilers. It was concluded that the 3 light sources evaluated in this study may be suitable for replacement of ICD light source in poultry facilities to reduce energy cost and optimize production efficiency.
本研究通过4次试验、每次试验2个重复,调查了光源和光照强度对体重超过3.0千克的重型肉鸡生长性能、胴体特性及福利指标的影响。总共960只1日龄的罗斯×罗斯708雏鸡(每个房间30只雄性/30只雌性)被随机分配到16个环境控制的房间中,相对湿度为50%。采用4×2析因处理结构,评估4种光源(白炽灯[ICD,标准]、紧凑型荧光灯[CFL]、中性发光二极管[Neutral-LED]和冷色家禽专用滤光发光二极管[Cool-PSF-LED])和2个光照强度水平(5勒克斯、20勒克斯)。4种光源中的每种都与2个光照强度水平中的一个配对。采用4阶段饲养程序(开食料、生长料、育肥料和停料期)给鸡饲喂相同的日粮。自由提供饲料和水。在鸡1、14、21、28、42和56日龄时称重鸡只和饲料以测定生长性能。每天记录所有死亡情况,并根据死亡率调整饲料转化率。在第28至35天测定免疫反应,而其他福利指标分别在第42天和第49天进行评估。在每次试验的第56天,对每个房间的20只鸡(10只雄性和10只雌性)进行屠宰,以测定体重和产肉量。与在白炽灯下饲养的鸡相比,在冷色家禽专用滤光发光二极管下饲养的鸡的体重、体重增加、活重和胴体重有所不同(P≤0.05)。然而,采食量、饲料转化率和死亡率不受处理的影响。处理对脂肪、胸肉和嫩肉重量及产量没有影响。此外,处理对眼睛发育、免疫反应和其他福利指标没有影响,这表明所评估的光源不会损害重型肉鸡的福利。得出的结论是,本研究中评估的3种光源可能适合在家禽养殖设施中替代白炽灯源,以降低能源成本并优化生产效率。