Suppr超能文献

动物福利政策:在野生动物研究背景下的实施——政策审查与基本问题讨论

Animal Welfare Policy: Implementation in the Context of Wildlife Research--Policy Review and Discussion of Fundamental Issues.

作者信息

Paul Ellen, Sikes Robert S, Beaupre Steven J, Wingfield John C

机构信息

Ellen Paul, JD, MS, is Executive Director of the Ornithological Council. Robert S. Sikes, PhD, is Professor of Biology at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Chair of the Animal Care and Use Committee, and President-elect of the American Society of Mammalogists. Steven J. Beaupre, PhD, is Professor and Chair in the Department of Biology at the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, and Past President of the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists. John C. Wingfield, PhD is Distinguished Professor of Neurobiology, Physiology, and Behavior at the University of California, Davis, and Past Director of the Division of Integrative Organismal Systems of the BIO division of the National Science Foundation.

出版信息

ILAR J. 2016;56(3):312-34. doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilv073.

Abstract

The use of vertebrate animals in research and education in the United States is subject to a number of regulations, policies, and guidelines under the immediate oversight of Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUCs), which are charged with ensuring the ethical and appropriate use of the animal subjects. In almost all instances, this regulatory and oversight landscape of animal use has been developed around domesticated animals in biomedical research environments. When the research activities involve wild species, especially in their natural habitat rather than a laboratory, oversight personnel and investigators alike struggle with determining what constitutes ethical and appropriate activities. These difficulties stem from fundamental differences in biology between wild and domesticated animals and from the differences in research objectives and methods in wildlife compared with biomedical research. Here we discuss the various policies, regulations, and guidance documents for animal use in the context of wildlife research. We compare the expectations of the various oversight agencies and how these expectations are met when working with wild vertebrates. We make recommendations for how IACUCs can use available resources to ensure that activities involving wild species are conducted in compliance with existing regulations and policies and in ways that are biologically appropriate for these nondomesticated species.

摘要

在美国,脊椎动物在研究和教育中的使用受到多项法规、政策和指导方针的约束,这些法规、政策和指导方针由机构动物护理和使用委员会(IACUC)直接监督,该委员会负责确保对动物实验对象进行符合道德规范且恰当的使用。几乎在所有情况下,这种动物使用的监管和监督体系都是围绕生物医学研究环境中的家养动物建立的。当研究活动涉及野生动物,尤其是在其自然栖息地而非实验室中时,监督人员和研究人员都难以确定什么是符合道德规范且恰当的活动。这些困难源于野生动物和家养动物在生物学上的根本差异,以及野生动物研究与生物医学研究在研究目标和方法上的差异。在此,我们讨论野生动物研究背景下动物使用的各种政策、法规和指导文件。我们比较了各监督机构的期望,以及在与野生脊椎动物合作时如何满足这些期望。我们就IACUC如何利用现有资源确保涉及野生动物的活动符合现行法规和政策,并以适合这些非家养物种的生物学方式进行,提出了建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验