Hartung Julia C, Wilitzki Silke, Thio-Lluch Marta, te Pas Arjan B, Schmalisch Gerd, Roehr Charles C
Department of Neonatology, Charité University Medical Center, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Neonatology, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 25;11(2):e0150224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150224. eCollection 2016.
International resuscitation guidelines suggest to use positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during manual ventilation of neonates. Aim of our study was to test the reliability of self-inflating bags (SIB) with single-use PEEP valves regarding PEEP delivery and the effect of different peak inflation pressures (PIP) and ventilation rates (VR) on the delivered PEEP.
Ten new single-use PEEP valves from 5 manufacturers were tested by ventilating an intubated 1 kg neonatal manikin containing a lung model with a SIB that was actuated by an electromechanical plunger device. Standard settings: PIP 20 cmH2O, VR 60/min, flow 8 L/min. PEEP settings of 5 and 10 cmH2O were studied. A second test was conducted with settings of PIP 40 cmH2O and VR 40/min. The delivered PEEP was measured by a respiratory function monitor (CO2SMO+).
Valves from one manufacturer delivered no relevant PEEP and were excluded. The remaining valves showed a continuous decay of the delivered pressure during expiration. The median (25th and 75th percentile) delivered PEEP with standard settings was 3.4(2.7-3.8) cmH2O when set to 5 cmH2O and 6.1(4.9-7.1) cmH2O when set to 10 cmH2O. Increasing the PIP from 20 to 40 cmH2O led to a median (25th and 75th percentile) decrease in PEEP to 2.3(1.8-2.7) cmH2O and 4.3(3.2-4.8) cmH2O; changing VR from 60 to 40/min led to a PEEP decrease to 2.8(2.1-3.3) cmH2O and 5.0(3.5-6.2) cmH2O for both PEEP settings.
Single-use PEEP valves do not reliably deliver the set PEEP. PIP and VR have an effect on the delivered PEEP. Operators should be aware of these limitations when manually ventilating neonates.
国际复苏指南建议在新生儿人工通气期间使用呼气末正压(PEEP)。我们研究的目的是测试配备一次性PEEP阀的自动充气式气囊(SIB)在输送PEEP方面的可靠性,以及不同的吸气峰压(PIP)和通气频率(VR)对所输送PEEP的影响。
通过使用由机电柱塞装置驱动的SIB对一个装有肺模型、体重1kg的插管新生儿人体模型进行通气,测试了来自5个制造商的10个新型一次性PEEP阀。标准设置:PIP 20cmH₂O,VR 60次/分钟,流量8L/分钟。研究了PEEP设置为5cmH₂O和10cmH₂O的情况。进行了第二次测试,设置为PIP 40cmH₂O和VR 40次/分钟。通过呼吸功能监测仪(CO2SMO+)测量所输送的PEEP。
来自一个制造商的阀门未输送出相关的PEEP,被排除在外。其余阀门在呼气期间所输送的压力持续下降。标准设置下,当设置为5cmH₂O时,所输送PEEP的中位数(第25和第75百分位数)为3.4(2.7 - 3.8)cmH₂O,当设置为10cmH₂O时为6.1(4.9 - 7.1)cmH₂O。将PIP从20cmH₂O增加到40cmH₂O导致PEEP中位数(第25和第75百分位数)下降至2.3(1.8 - 2.7)cmH₂O和4.3(3.2 - 4.8)cmH₂O;将VR从60次/分钟更改为40次/分钟导致两种PEEP设置下的PEEP均下降至2.8(2.1 - 3.3)cmH₂O和5.0(3.5 - 6.2)cmH₂O。
一次性PEEP阀不能可靠地输送设定的PEEP。PIP和VR对所输送的PEEP有影响。在对新生儿进行人工通气时,操作人员应意识到这些局限性。