Gilson Nicholas D, Ng Norman, Pavey Toby G, Ryde Gemma C, Straker Leon, Brown Wendy J
School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Australia.
School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Australia.
J Sci Med Sport. 2016 Nov;19(11):926-930. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.01.009. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
This efficacy study assessed the added impact real time computer prompts had on a participatory approach to reduce occupational sedentary exposure and increase physical activity.
Quasi-experimental.
57 Australian office workers (mean [SD]; age=47 [11] years; BMI=28 [5]kg/m; 46 men) generated a menu of 20 occupational 'sit less and move more' strategies through participatory workshops, and were then tasked with implementing strategies for five months (July-November 2014). During implementation, a sub-sample of workers (n=24) used a chair sensor/software package (Sitting Pad) that gave real time prompts to interrupt desk sitting. Baseline and intervention sedentary behaviour and physical activity (GENEActiv accelerometer; mean work time percentages), and minutes spent sitting at desks (Sitting Pad; mean total time and longest bout) were compared between non-prompt and prompt workers using a two-way ANOVA.
Workers spent close to three quarters of their work time sedentary, mostly sitting at desks (mean [SD]; total desk sitting time=371 [71]min/day; longest bout spent desk sitting=104 [43]min/day). Intervention effects were four times greater in workers who used real time computer prompts (8% decrease in work time sedentary behaviour and increase in light intensity physical activity; p<0.01). Respective mean differences between baseline and intervention total time spent sitting at desks, and the longest bout spent desk sitting, were 23 and 32min/day lower in prompt than in non-prompt workers (p<0.01).
In this sample of office workers, real time computer prompts facilitated the impact of a participatory approach on reductions in occupational sedentary exposure, and increases in physical activity.
本疗效研究评估了实时计算机提示对采用参与式方法减少职业久坐暴露和增加身体活动的额外影响。
准实验性研究。
57名澳大利亚办公室职员(均值[标准差];年龄=47[11]岁;体重指数=28[5]kg/m²;46名男性)通过参与式工作坊制定了20项职业“少坐多动”策略菜单,然后负责在五个月内(2014年7月至11月)实施这些策略。在实施过程中,一部分职员(n=24)使用了椅子传感器/软件包(坐垫),该软件会给出实时提示以打断久坐。使用双向方差分析比较了未使用提示和使用提示的职员在基线和干预后的久坐行为及身体活动情况(GENEActiv加速度计;平均工作时间百分比),以及坐在办公桌前的分钟数(坐垫;平均总时间和最长单次时长)。
职员工作时间中有近四分之三处于久坐状态,大部分时间是坐在办公桌前(均值[标准差];每天坐在办公桌前的总时长=371[71]分钟;坐在办公桌前的最长单次时长=104[43]分钟)。使用实时计算机提示的职员干预效果要大四倍(工作时间久坐行为减少8%,轻度体力活动增加;p<0.01)。与未使用提示的职员相比,使用提示的职员在基线和干预后坐在办公桌前的总时长及最长单次时长的平均差异分别低23分钟/天和32分钟/天(p<0.01)。
在这个办公室职员样本中,实时计算机提示促进了参与式方法对减少职业久坐暴露和增加身体活动的影响。