van Maarseveen Erik M, Gipmans Suzan, Vasbinder Erwin, Petjak Manfred, van Zanten Arthur R H
*Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht; †Department of Clinical Pharmacy, ‡Department of Intensive Care, Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda; and §Department of Intensive Care, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, the Netherlands.
Ther Drug Monit. 2016 Jun;38(3):398-401. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000295.
To increase target attainment rates, switching the mode of administration from intermittent (InI) to continuous infusion (CoI) has been proposed. In this study, target attainment rates and interpatient variation in exposure were compared between vancomycin InI- and CoI-treated critically ill patients.
An observational cohort study was conducted among critically ill patients admitted to a level-2 intensive care unit. Adult patients (18 years or older) treated with intravenous vancomycin for various indications, including sepsis, pneumonia, and endocarditis between 2007 and 2013 were eligible for inclusion. In 2010, vancomycin mode of administration switched from intermittent to continuous. Vancomycin was administered through intravenous infusion, and dosing was guided by therapeutic drug monitoring. Target attainment rates and variations in serum concentration and estimated area under the curve (AUC) were compared between groups.
The target attainment rate for therapeutic vancomycin exposure was higher in the group treated with CoI than in patients treated with InI (48% versus 19%, P < 0.001). Furthermore, between-patient variation in vancomycin serum concentration was nearly twice as high in intermittently infused patients compared with continuously infused patients. Finally, the correlation between serum concentration and AUC was stronger among patients on vancomycin continuous infusion than that of the intermittently dosed group (r 0.93 versus 0.72).
Switching from intermittent to continuous infusion of vancomycin in a critically ill population provided higher target attainment rates and a more robust drug exposure. Furthermore, continuous infusion yielded stronger concentration-AUC correlations facilitating a single sample therapeutic drug monitoring strategy with AUC targets. A switch to continuous infusion may therefore improve clinical outcomes in vancomycin-treated critically ill patients.
为提高目标达成率,已有人提出将给药方式从间歇给药(InI)改为持续输注(CoI)。本研究比较了接受万古霉素间歇给药和持续输注治疗的重症患者的目标达成率以及患者间暴露量的差异。
在一家二级重症监护病房收治的重症患者中开展了一项观察性队列研究。纳入2007年至2013年间因包括败血症、肺炎和心内膜炎等各种适应症接受静脉注射万古霉素治疗的成年患者(18岁及以上)。2010年,万古霉素给药方式从间歇给药改为持续输注。万古霉素通过静脉输注给药,给药剂量由治疗药物监测指导。比较两组之间的目标达成率以及血清浓度和曲线下面积(AUC)估计值的差异。
接受持续输注治疗的组中万古霉素治疗性暴露的目标达成率高于接受间歇给药治疗的患者(48%对19%,P<0.001)。此外,间歇输注患者的万古霉素血清浓度患者间差异几乎是持续输注患者的两倍。最后,万古霉素持续输注患者的血清浓度与AUC之间的相关性强于间歇给药组(r分别为0.93和0.72)。
在重症患者中,将万古霉素给药方式从间歇输注改为持续输注可提高目标达成率,并使药物暴露更稳定。此外,持续输注产生更强的浓度-AUC相关性,便于采用以AUC为目标的单样本治疗药物监测策略。因此,改为持续输注可能改善接受万古霉素治疗的重症患者的临床结局。