Capp Roberta, Kelley Lauren, Ellis Peter, Carmona Juan, Lofton Adrienne, Cobbs-Lomax Darcey, D'Onofrio Gail
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Project Access-New Haven, New Haven, CT.
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Apr;23(4):476-81. doi: 10.1111/acem.12952. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
The Affordable Care Act initiated several care coordination programs tailored to reduce emergency department (ED) use for Medicaid-enrolled frequent ED users. It is important to clarify from the patient's perspective why Medicaid enrollees who want to receive care coordination services to improve primary care utilization frequently use the ED.
We conducted a qualitative data analysis of patient summary reports obtained from Medicaid enrolled frequent ED users who agreed to participate in a randomized control trial (RCT) evaluating the impact of patient navigation intervention compared with standard of care on ED use and hospital admissions. We defined frequent ED users as those who used the ED four to 18 times in the past year. The study was conducted at an urban, teaching hospital ED with approximately 90,000 visits per year. The research staff conducted interviews (~30-40 minutes), regarding the patient's medical history, reasons for ED visits, health care access issues, and social distresses. The aforementioned findings were summarized in a 1- to 2-page report and presented to the RCT's project team (social worker, emergency medicine physician, primary care physician, and patient navigators) on a weekly basis to further understand the needs of this patient population. A diverse team of researchers (program staff and physicians) coded all reports and reached consensus using reflexive team analysis. We reconciled differences in code interpretations and generated themes.
One-hundred patients enrolled in the RCT from March 2013 to February 2014, and all 100 patient summary reports were evaluated. We identified three key themes associated with Medicaid enrollee frequent ED use: 1) negative personal experiences with the healthcare system, 2) challenges associated with having low socioeconomic status, and 3) significant chronic mental and physical disease burden.
Medicaid frequent ED users engaged in receiving patient navigation services with the goal to reduce ED use and hospital admissions describe barriers that go beyond timely primary care access issues. These include sociodeterminants of health, lack of trust in primary care providers, and healthcare system.
《平价医疗法案》启动了多项护理协调项目,旨在减少医疗补助计划参保的频繁急诊使用者前往急诊科就诊的次数。从患者角度阐明为何希望获得护理协调服务以提高初级保健利用率的医疗补助计划参保者会频繁前往急诊科就诊,这一点很重要。
我们对从同意参与一项随机对照试验(RCT)的医疗补助计划参保的频繁急诊使用者处获得的患者总结报告进行了定性数据分析,该试验评估了患者导航干预与常规治疗对急诊就诊和住院情况的影响。我们将频繁急诊使用者定义为过去一年中前往急诊科就诊4至18次的患者。该研究在一家城市教学医院的急诊科进行,该急诊科每年约有90000人次就诊。研究人员进行了访谈(约30 - 40分钟),内容涉及患者的病史、急诊就诊原因、医疗保健获取问题以及社会困扰。上述调查结果被总结在一份1至2页的报告中,并每周提交给随机对照试验的项目团队(社会工作者、急诊医学医生、初级保健医生和患者导航员),以进一步了解该患者群体的需求。一组多元化的研究人员(项目工作人员和医生)对所有报告进行编码,并通过反思性团队分析达成共识。我们协调了代码解释上的差异并生成了主题。
2013年3月至2014年2月期间,100名患者参与了随机对照试验,所有100份患者总结报告均得到评估。我们确定了与医疗补助计划参保者频繁急诊就诊相关的三个关键主题:1)与医疗保健系统的负面个人经历;2)与社会经济地位低下相关的挑战;3)严重的慢性身心疾病负担。
参与接受患者导航服务以减少急诊就诊和住院次数的医疗补助计划频繁急诊使用者描述了超出及时获得初级保健问题之外的障碍。这些障碍包括健康的社会决定因素、对初级保健提供者和医疗保健系统缺乏信任。