Kumar Santhosh, Kroon Jeroen, Lalloo Ratilal, Johnson Newell W
Population and Social Health Research Programme, Menzies Health Institute Queensland and School of Dentistry and Oral Health, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia.
School of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Mar 1;14:34. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0433-7.
Parental-Caregiver Perception Questionnaire (P-CPQ) and Family Impact Scale (FIS) are commonly used measures to evaluate the parent's perception of the impact of children's oral health on quality of life and family respectively. Recently, shorter forms of P-CPQ and FIS have been developed. No study has sought to validate these short forms in other languages and cultures. This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of FIS, 8 and 16-item P-CPQ in a Telugu speaking population of India.
For this cross-sectional study, a multi-stage random sampling technique was used to recruit 11-13 year-old schoolchildren of Medak district, Telangana, India and their parents (n = 1342). Parents were approached with questionnaires through their children who underwent clinical examinations for dental caries, fluorosis and malocclusion. The translated versions underwent pilot testing (n = 40), test-retest reliability was also assessed (n = 161).
The overall summary scale and subscales of the short forms of P-CPQ and FIS failed to discriminate between the categories of dental caries severity. Also, malocclusion status was not related to the domain or overall scores of both the short forms of P-CPQ. There were significant differences in subscale and overall scores of 16 and 8-item P-CPQ and FIS between the fluorosis categories. Both 16 and 8-item P-CPQ summary scales were significantly related to parent's global rating of oral health (16-item, r = 0.30, p < 0.01; 8-item, r = 0.28, p < 0.01) and overall wellbeing (16-item, r = 0.22, p < 0.01; 8-item, r = 0.22, p < 0.01), thereby exhibiting good construct validity. However, the correlation of emotional and social wellbeing scales of short forms of P-CPQ and FIS with global ratings was of low strength. Cronbach's alphas for FIS, 16-items and 8-items P-CPQ scales were 0.78, 0.83 and 0.71 respectively, while the Intra-Class Correlation coefficients were 0.752, 0.812 and 0.816 respectively. Cronbach's alphas for most of the subscales of short forms of P-CPQ were less than 0.7.
The overall scales of 16 and 8-items P-CPQ scales demonstrated good construct validity while the construct validity of FIS was questionable. Discriminant validity of all the three instruments was good only in relation to fluorosis. Overall scales of all three short forms exhibited acceptable internal consistency and reliability on repeated administrations.
父母-照顾者认知问卷(P-CPQ)和家庭影响量表(FIS)是常用的测量工具,分别用于评估父母对儿童口腔健康对生活质量和家庭影响的认知。最近,已开发出P-CPQ和FIS的简短形式。尚无研究试图在其他语言和文化中验证这些简短形式。本研究旨在评估FIS、8项和16项P-CPQ在印度说泰卢固语人群中的有效性和可靠性。
在这项横断面研究中,采用多阶段随机抽样技术招募了印度特伦甘纳邦梅达克区11-13岁的学童及其父母(n = 1342)。通过正在接受龋齿、氟斑牙和错颌畸形临床检查的孩子向父母发放问卷。翻译后的版本进行了预测试(n = 40),还评估了重测信度(n = 161)。
P-CPQ和FIS简短形式的总体汇总量表和子量表未能区分龋齿严重程度类别。此外,错颌畸形状况与P-CPQ简短形式的领域或总分均无关。氟斑牙类别之间,16项和8项P-CPQ以及FIS的子量表和总分存在显著差异。16项和8项P-CPQ汇总量表均与父母对口腔健康的总体评分显著相关(16项,r = 0.30,p < 0.01;8项,r = 0.28,p < 0.01)以及总体幸福感(16项,r = 0.22,p < 0.01;8项,r = 0.22,p < 0.01),从而表现出良好的结构效度。然而,P-CPQ和FIS简短形式的情感和社会幸福感量表与总体评分的相关性强度较低。FIS、16项和8项P-CPQ量表的Cronbach's α系数分别为0.78、0.83和0.71,而组内相关系数分别为0.752、0.812和0.816。P-CPQ简短形式的大多数子量表的Cronbach's α系数小于0.7。
16项和8项P-CPQ量表的总体量表表现出良好的结构效度,而FIS的结构效度值得怀疑。所有三种工具的区分效度仅在氟斑牙方面表现良好。所有三种简短形式的总体量表在重复施测时表现出可接受的内部一致性和可靠性。