Suppr超能文献

坐骨神经痛中静脉注射吗啡与对乙酰氨基酚的比较:一项随机安慰剂对照试验。

Comparison of Intravenous Morphine Versus Paracetamol in Sciatica: A Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Serinken Mustafa, Eken Cenker, Gungor Faruk, Emet Mucahit, Al Behcet

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Pamukkale University Hospital, Denizli, Turkey.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Akdeniz University Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Jun;23(6):674-8. doi: 10.1111/acem.12956. Epub 2016 May 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to compare intravenous morphine and intravenous acetaminophen (paracetamol) for pain treatment in patients presenting to the emergency department with sciatica.

METHODS

Patients, between the ages of 21 and 65 years, suffering from pain in the sciatic nerve distribution and a positive straight leg-raise test composed the study population. Study patients were assigned to one of three intravenous interventions: morphine (0.1 mg/kg), acetaminophen (1 g), or placebo. Physicians, nurses, and patients were blinded to the study drug. Changes in pain intensity were measured at 15 and 30 minutes using a visual analog scale. Rescue drug (fentanyl) use and adverse effects were also recorded.

RESULTS

Three-hundred patients were randomized. The median change in pain intensity between treatment arms at 30 minutes were as follows: morphine versus acetaminophen 25 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] = 20 to 29 mm), morphine versus placebo 41 mm (95% CI = 37 to 45 mm), and acetaminophen versus placebo 16 mm (95% CI = 12 to 20 mm). Eighty percent of the patients in the placebo group (95% CI = 63.0% to 99%), 18% of the patients in the acetaminophen group (95% CI = 10.7% to 28.5%), and 6% of those in the morphine group (95% CI = 2.0% to 13.2%) required a rescue drug. Adverse effects were similar between the morphine and acetaminophen groups.

CONCLUSION

Morphine and acetaminophen are both effective for treating sciatica at 30 minutes. However, morphine is superior to acetaminophen.

摘要

目的

比较静脉注射吗啡和静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚(扑热息痛)用于急诊科坐骨神经痛患者疼痛治疗的效果。

方法

年龄在21至65岁之间、坐骨神经分布区疼痛且直腿抬高试验阳性的患者构成研究人群。研究患者被分配至三种静脉干预措施之一:吗啡(0.1毫克/千克)、对乙酰氨基酚(1克)或安慰剂。医生、护士和患者对研究药物均不知情。使用视觉模拟量表在15分钟和30分钟时测量疼痛强度的变化。还记录了急救药物(芬太尼)的使用情况和不良反应。

结果

300名患者被随机分组。30分钟时各治疗组之间疼痛强度的中位数变化如下:吗啡组与对乙酰氨基酚组为25毫米(95%置信区间[CI]=20至29毫米),吗啡组与安慰剂组为41毫米(95%CI=37至45毫米),对乙酰氨基酚组与安慰剂组为16毫米(95%CI=12至20毫米)。安慰剂组80%的患者(95%CI=63.0%至99%)、对乙酰氨基酚组18%的患者(95%CI=10.7%至28.5%)以及吗啡组6%的患者(95%CI=2.0%至13.2%)需要使用急救药物。吗啡组和对乙酰氨基酚组的不良反应相似。

结论

吗啡和对乙酰氨基酚在30分钟时均对治疗坐骨神经痛有效。然而,吗啡优于对乙酰氨基酚。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验