Sun Xiaojie, Liu Xiaoyun, Sun Qiang, Yip Winnie, Wagstaff Adam, Meng Qingyue
Center for Health Management and Policy (Key Laboratory of Health Economics and Policy, National Health and Family Planning Commission), Shandong University, Jinan, China.
China Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Health Econ. 2016 Jun;25(6):706-22. doi: 10.1002/hec.3330. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
In this prospective study, conducted in China where providers have traditionally been paid fee-for-service, and where drug spending is high and irrational drug prescribing common, township health centers in two counties were assigned to two groups: in one fee-for-service was replaced by a capitated global budget (CGB); in the other by a mix of CGB and pay-for-performance. In the latter, 20% of the CGB was withheld each quarter, with the amount returned depending on points deducted for failure to meet performance targets. Outcomes studied included indicators of rational drug prescribing and prescription cost. Impacts were assessed using differences-in-differences, because political interference led to non-random assignment across the two groups. The combination of capitated global budget and pay-for-performance reduced irrational prescribing substantially relative to capitated global budget but only in the county that started above the penalty targets. Endline rates were still appreciable, however, and no effects were found in either county on out-of-pocket spending. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
在这项前瞻性研究中,研究在中国开展,当地医疗服务提供者传统上按服务收费,药品支出高昂且不合理用药处方普遍。两个县的乡镇卫生院被分为两组:一组将按服务收费改为总额预付制(CGB);另一组采用总额预付制与绩效薪酬相结合的方式。在后者中,每季度扣留20%的总额预付资金,返还金额取决于因未达到绩效目标而扣除的分数。研究的结果包括合理用药处方指标和处方成本。由于政治干预导致两组之间的分配并非随机,因此使用差分法评估影响。与总额预付制相比,总额预付制与绩效薪酬相结合的方式大幅减少了不合理用药处方,但仅在起始水平高于惩罚目标的县是如此。然而,最终水平仍然可观,而且两个县在自付费用方面均未发现有影响。版权所有© 2016约翰·威利父子有限公司。