Hardwick Nicola, Frankel Paul H, Cristea Mihaela
Department of Experimental Therapeutics, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
Division of Biostatistics, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2016 Mar;17(3):14. doi: 10.1007/s11864-016-0389-1.
The immune system plays an active role in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer (OC), as well as in the mechanisms of disease progression and overall survival (OS). Immunotherapy in gynecological cancers could help to revert immunosuppression and lymphocyte depletion due to prior treatments. Current immunotherapies for ovarian cancer, like all cancer immunotherapy, are based on either stimulating the immune system or reverting immune suppression. Several approaches have been used, including therapeutic vaccines, monoclonal antibodies; checkpoint inhibitors and adoptive T cell transfer. Most of these therapies are still in early-phase testing (phase I and II) for ovarian cancer, but the initial data in ovarian cancer and successful use in other types of cancers suggests some of these approaches may ultimately prove useful for ovarian cancer as well. Ovarian cancer vaccines have shown only a modest benefit in ovarian cancer when used as monotherapy, but these agents may be able to enhance antitumor activity when combined with chemotherapy, checkpoint inhibitors, or other immunotherapies. Monoclonal antibodies have been explored in ovarian cancer but despite encouraging phase II data, randomized studies failed to demonstrate significant clinical benefit. Check point inhibitors have promising activity in several solid tumors and have demonstrated a favorable toxicity profile. Data from early clinical trials utilizing PD1 and PD-L1 inhibitors showed encouraging results. Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating the role of check point inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy. Adoptive T cell transfer involves the infusion of ex vivo activated and expanded tumor specific T cells, using various sources and types of T cells. While this approach has been explored in several hematologic malignancies, it constitutes early research in ovarian cancer. Immunotherapy remains investigational in ovarian cancer and the benefit of this approach in improving progression-free survival (PFS) or OS is unknown. Previous clinical trials have not selected patients based on biomarkers and this may explain the negative results. We expect to discover that tumor response will relate to the patient's immune features and specific tumor characteristics. We are only beginning to realize the potential of immunotherapy for ovarian cancer patients, and one goal of future clinical trials will be to identify subsets of patient based on histologic, molecular, and immune characteristics.
免疫系统在卵巢癌(OC)的发病机制以及疾病进展和总生存期(OS)机制中发挥着积极作用。妇科癌症的免疫疗法有助于逆转因先前治疗导致的免疫抑制和淋巴细胞耗竭。目前用于卵巢癌的免疫疗法,与所有癌症免疫疗法一样,要么基于刺激免疫系统,要么基于逆转免疫抑制。已经采用了几种方法,包括治疗性疫苗、单克隆抗体、检查点抑制剂和过继性T细胞转移。这些疗法中的大多数仍处于卵巢癌的早期试验阶段(I期和II期),但卵巢癌的初步数据以及在其他类型癌症中的成功应用表明,其中一些方法最终可能对卵巢癌也有用。卵巢癌疫苗作为单一疗法在卵巢癌中仅显示出适度的益处,但这些药物与化疗、检查点抑制剂或其他免疫疗法联合使用时可能能够增强抗肿瘤活性。单克隆抗体已在卵巢癌中进行了探索,但尽管II期数据令人鼓舞,但随机研究未能证明有显著的临床益处。检查点抑制剂在几种实体瘤中具有有前景的活性,并已显示出良好的毒性特征。利用PD1和PD-L1抑制剂的早期临床试验数据显示出令人鼓舞的结果。正在进行的临床试验正在评估检查点抑制剂与化疗联合使用的作用。过继性T细胞转移涉及输注体外激活和扩增的肿瘤特异性T细胞,使用各种来源和类型的T细胞。虽然这种方法已在几种血液系统恶性肿瘤中进行了探索,但在卵巢癌中仍处于早期研究阶段。免疫疗法在卵巢癌中仍处于研究阶段,这种方法在改善无进展生存期(PFS)或OS方面的益处尚不清楚。先前的临床试验没有根据生物标志物选择患者,这可能解释了阴性结果。我们预计会发现肿瘤反应将与患者的免疫特征和特定肿瘤特征相关。我们才刚刚开始认识到免疫疗法对卵巢癌患者的潜力,未来临床试验的一个目标将是根据组织学、分子和免疫特征确定患者亚组。