Carriedo Nuria, Corral Antonio, Montoro Pedro R, Herrero Laura, Ballestrino Patricia, Sebastián Iraia
Departamento de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación, National Distance Education University (UNED), Madrid, Spain.
Departamento de Psicología Básica 1, National Distance Education University (UNED), Madrid, Spain.
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 8;11(3):e0150289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150289. eCollection 2016.
Our main objective was to analyse the different contributions of relational verbal reasoning (analogical and class inclusion) and executive functioning to metaphor comprehension across development. We postulated that both relational reasoning and executive functioning should predict individual and developmental differences. However, executive functioning would become increasingly involved when metaphor comprehension is highly demanding, either because of the metaphors' high difficulty (relatively novel metaphors in the absence of a context) or because of the individual's special processing difficulties, such as low levels of reading experience or low semantic knowledge. Three groups of participants, 11-year-olds, 15-year-olds and young adults, were assessed in different relational verbal reasoning tasks-analogical and class-inclusion-and in executive functioning tasks-updating information in working memory, inhibition, and shifting. The results revealed clear progress in metaphor comprehension between ages 11 and 15 and between ages 15 and 21. However, the importance of executive function in metaphor comprehension was evident by age 15 and was restricted to updating information in working memory and cognitive inhibition. Participants seemed to use two different strategies to interpret metaphors: relational verbal reasoning and executive functioning. This was clearly shown when comparing the performance of the "more efficient" participants in metaphor interpretation with that of the "less efficient" ones. Whereas in the first case none of the executive variables or those associated with relational verbal reasoning were significantly related to metaphor comprehension, in the latter case, both groups of variables had a clear predictor effect.
我们的主要目标是分析关系性言语推理(类比和类包含)以及执行功能在不同发展阶段对隐喻理解的不同贡献。我们假设关系性推理和执行功能都应能预测个体差异和发展差异。然而,当隐喻理解要求很高时,执行功能的参与度会越来越高,这要么是因为隐喻难度很大(在没有语境的情况下相对新颖的隐喻),要么是因为个体存在特殊的加工困难,比如阅读经验不足或语义知识匮乏。我们对三组参与者进行了评估,分别是11岁、15岁和青年成年人,评估内容包括不同的关系性言语推理任务——类比和类包含,以及执行功能任务——在工作记忆中更新信息、抑制和转换。结果显示,11岁至15岁以及15岁至21岁之间,隐喻理解有明显进步。然而,执行功能在隐喻理解中的重要性在15岁时就已显现,且仅限于在工作记忆中更新信息和认知抑制方面。参与者似乎使用两种不同策略来解释隐喻:关系性言语推理和执行功能。将隐喻解释中“效率较高”的参与者与“效率较低”的参与者的表现进行比较时,这一点就很明显。在第一种情况下,执行变量或与关系性言语推理相关的变量与隐喻理解均无显著关联,而在第二种情况下,两组变量都有明显的预测作用。