Maggiolini Stefano, Gentile Gaetano, Farina Andrea, De Carlini Caterina C, Lenatti Laura, Meles Ester, Achilli Felice, Tempesta Angela, Brucato Antonio, Imazio Massimo
Cardiovascular Department, San L. Mandic Hospital, Merate, Lecco, Italy.
Cardiovascular Department, San L. Mandic Hospital, Merate, Lecco, Italy.
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Apr 15;117(8):1369-74. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.01.043. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
Pericardiocentesis is useful in the diagnosis and treatment of pericardial effusive disease. To date, a number of methods have been developed to reduce complications and increase the success rate of the procedure. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of echocardiography-guided pericardiocentesis under continuous echocardiographic monitoring in the management of pericardial effusion. We prospectively performed 161 pericardiocentesis procedures in 141 patients admitted from 1993 to 2015 in 3 centers. This procedure was performed for tamponade or large pericardial effusion in 157 cases and for diagnosis in 4 cases. A percutaneous puncture was performed where the largest amount of fluid was detected. To perform a real-time echo-guided procedure, a multi-angle bracket was mounted on the echocardiographic probe to support the needle and enable its continuous visualization during the puncture. The procedure was successful in 160 of 161 cases (99%). Two major complications occurred (1.2%): 1 mediastinal hematoma that required surgical drainage in a patient on anticoagulant therapy and 1 pleuropericardial shunt requiring thoracentesis. Seven minor complications occurred (4.3%): 1 pleuropericardial shunt, 1 case of transient AV type III block, 3 vasovagal reactions (1 with syncope), and 2 cases of acute pulmonary edema managed with medical therapy. No punctures of any cardiac chamber occurred, and emergency surgical drainage was not required in any case. In conclusion, echocardiography-guided pericardiocentesis under continuous visualization is effective, safe, and easy to perform, even in hospitals with low volumes of procedures with or without cardiac surgery.
心包穿刺术在诊断和治疗心包积液性疾病中很有用。迄今为止,已经开发了多种方法来减少并发症并提高该操作的成功率。本研究的目的是评估在连续超声心动图监测下,超声心动图引导心包穿刺术在处理心包积液中的有效性和安全性。我们前瞻性地对1993年至2015年期间3个中心收治的141例患者进行了161次心包穿刺术。该操作在157例中用于心包填塞或大量心包积液,4例用于诊断。在检测到最大量液体的部位进行经皮穿刺。为了进行实时超声引导操作,在超声心动图探头上安装了多角度支架以支撑穿刺针,并在穿刺过程中使其能持续可视化。161例中有160例操作成功(99%)。发生了2例主要并发症(1.2%):1例纵隔血肿,该患者接受抗凝治疗,需要手术引流;1例胸膜心包分流,需要胸腔穿刺。发生了7例次要并发症(4.3%):1例胸膜心包分流、1例短暂性房室传导阻滞Ⅲ型、3例血管迷走反应(1例伴晕厥)、2例急性肺水肿经药物治疗。未发生任何心腔穿刺,且在任何情况下均无需紧急手术引流。总之,即使在手术量少的医院,无论有无心脏外科手术,在持续可视化下进行超声心动图引导心包穿刺术都是有效、安全且易于实施的。