Kim S, Kim H, Kim W J, Lee S-J, Hong Y, Lee H-Y, Lim M-N, Han S-S
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2016 Apr;20(4):524-9. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.15.0690.
To analyse the predictors and mortality rate among patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV) for respiratory failure due to pulmonary tuberculosis (TB).
We retrospectively compared patients who required MV for TB with patients who required MV for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).
In-hospital mortality was significantly different between the two groups: 95.1% in TB vs. 62.7% in CAP (P < 0.001 using the χ(2) test). TB patients had a higher 30-day mortality (P = 0.040 using log-rank test), although the median sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) (7.0 vs. 6.0, P = 0.842) and mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores (20.0 ± 6.7 vs. 21.2 ± 6.7, P = 0.379) for TB and CAP patients were not different. TB patients were more likely to have increased lung lesion intrusions (OR 1.307, 95%CI 1.042-1.641, P = 0.021), and reduced albumin (OR 0.073, 95%CI 0.016-0.335, P = 0.001), C-reactive protein (OR 0.324, 95%CI 0.146-0.716, P = 0.005) and CURB-65 score (confusion, uraemia, respiratory rate, blood pressure and age ⩾65 years) (OR 0.916, 95%CI 0.844-0.995, P = 0.037).
TB patients showed identical SOFA and APACHE II scores, but higher mortality than CAP patients. The higher mortality was not related to severity, but suggested an association with the extent of destructive lung lesions.
分析因肺结核(TB)导致呼吸衰竭而接受机械通气(MV)的患者的预测因素和死亡率。
我们回顾性比较了因结核病需要机械通气的患者和因社区获得性肺炎(CAP)需要机械通气的患者。
两组患者的院内死亡率有显著差异:结核病患者为95.1%,而社区获得性肺炎患者为62.7%(χ²检验,P < 0.001)。结核病患者的30天死亡率更高(对数秩检验,P = 0.040),尽管结核病患者和社区获得性肺炎患者的序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)中位数(7.0对6.0,P = 0.842)和急性生理与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)II平均评分(20.0±6.7对21.2±6.7,P = 0.379)并无差异。结核病患者更有可能出现肺部病变侵犯增加(比值比1.307,95%置信区间1.042 - 1.641,P = 0.021),以及白蛋白降低(比值比0.073,95%置信区间0.016 - 0.335,P = 0.001)、C反应蛋白降低(比值比0.324,95%置信区间0.146 - 0.716,P = 0.005)和CURB - 65评分(意识模糊、尿毒症、呼吸频率、血压和年龄≥65岁)降低(比值比0.916,95%置信区间0.844 - 0.995,P = 0.037)。
结核病患者的SOFA和APACHE II评分相同,但死亡率高于社区获得性肺炎患者。较高的死亡率与病情严重程度无关,而是提示与肺部破坏性病变的范围有关。