Smith Dustin, Miller Daniel G, Cukor Jeffrey
Loma Linda University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Loma Linda, California.
University of Iowa, Department of Emergency Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa.
West J Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;17(2):149-52. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.12.28269. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
Work interruptions during patient care have been correlated with error. Task-switching is identified by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) as a core competency for emergency medicine (EM). Simulation has been suggested as a means of assessing EM core competencies. We assumed that senior EM residents had better task-switching abilities than junior EM residents. We hypothesized that this difference could be measured by observing the execution of patient care tasks in the simulation environment when a patient with a ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) interrupted the ongoing management of a septic shock case.
This was a multi-site, prospective, observational, cohort study. The study population consisted of a convenience sample of EM residents in their first three years of training. Each subject performed a standardized simulated encounter by evaluating and treating a patient in septic shock. At a predetermined point in every sepsis case, the subject was given a STEMI electrocardiogram (ECG) for a separate chest pain patient in triage and required to verbalize an interpretation and action. We scored learner performance using a dichotomous checklist of critical actions covering sepsis care, ECG interpretation and triaging of the STEMI patient.
Ninety-one subjects participated (30 postgraduate year [PGY]1s, 32 PGY2s, and 29 PGY3s). Of those, 87 properly managed the patient with septic shock (90.0% PGY1s, 100% PGY2, 96.6% PGY 3s; p=0.22). Of the 87 who successfully managed the septic shock, 80 correctly identified STEMI on the simulated STEMI patient (86.7% PGY1s, 96.9% PGY2s, 93.1% PGY3s; p=0.35). Of the 80 who successfully managed the septic shock patient and correctly identified the STEMI, 79 provided appropriate interventions for the STEMI patient (73.3% PGY1s, 93.8% PGY2s, 93.8% PGY3s; p=0.07).
When management of a septic shock patient was interrupted with a STEMI ECG in a simulated environment we were unable to measure a significant difference in the ability of EM residents to successfully task-switch when compared across PGY levels of training. This study may help refine the use of simulation to assess EM resident competencies.
在患者护理过程中的工作中断与差错相关。任务转换被毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)确定为急诊医学(EM)的一项核心能力。模拟已被提议作为评估急诊医学核心能力的一种手段。我们假设急诊医学高年级住院医师比低年级住院医师具有更好的任务转换能力。我们推测,当一名ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中断正在进行的感染性休克病例管理时,通过在模拟环境中观察患者护理任务的执行情况,可以衡量这种差异。
这是一项多中心、前瞻性、观察性队列研究。研究人群包括处于培训前三年的急诊医学住院医师的便利样本。每个受试者通过评估和治疗一名感染性休克患者进行标准化模拟接诊。在每个脓毒症病例的预定时间点,给受试者一份STEMI心电图(ECG),用于分诊中另一名胸痛患者,并要求其说出解读和行动方案。我们使用一份涵盖脓毒症护理、ECG解读和STEMI患者分诊的关键行动二分法清单对学习者的表现进行评分。
91名受试者参与研究(30名一年级住院医师[PGY]1、32名PGY2和29名PGY3)。其中,87名正确管理了感染性休克患者(PGY1为90.0%,PGY2为100%,PGY3为96.6%;p=0.22)。在87名成功管理感染性休克的受试者中,80名在模拟的STEMI患者身上正确识别出STEMI(PGY1为86.7%,PGY2为96.9%,PGY3为93.1%;p=0.35)。在80名成功管理感染性休克患者并正确识别出STEMI的受试者中,79名对STEMI患者采取了适当干预措施(PGY1为73.3%,PGY2为93.8%,PGY3为93.8%;p=0.07)。
在模拟环境中,当感染性休克患者的管理被STEMI心电图中断时,我们无法测量出不同培训阶段(PGY水平)的急诊医学住院医师在成功进行任务转换能力方面的显著差异。本研究可能有助于完善模拟方法在评估急诊医学住院医师能力方面的应用。