Suppr超能文献

《广泛性发育障碍评定量表第二版(GARS-2)在发育障碍样本中的因子结构、内部一致性及筛查敏感性》

Factor Structure, Internal Consistency, and Screening Sensitivity of the GARS-2 in a Developmental Disabilities Sample.

作者信息

Volker Martin A, Dua Elissa H, Lopata Christopher, Thomeer Marcus L, Toomey Jennifer A, Smerbeck Audrey M, Rodgers Jonathan D, Popkin Joshua R, Nelson Andrew T, Lee Gloria K

机构信息

Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education, College of Education, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1034, USA.

Department of Counseling, School and Educational Psychology, Graduate School of Education, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260-1000, USA.

出版信息

Autism Res Treat. 2016;2016:8243079. doi: 10.1155/2016/8243079. Epub 2016 Feb 15.

Abstract

The Gilliam Autism Rating Scale-Second Edition (GARS-2) is a widely used screening instrument that assists in the identification and diagnosis of autism. The purpose of this study was to examine the factor structure, internal consistency, and screening sensitivity of the GARS-2 using ratings from special education teaching staff for a sample of 240 individuals with autism or other significant developmental disabilities. Exploratory factor analysis yielded a correlated three-factor solution similar to that found in 2005 by Lecavalier for the original GARS. Though the three factors appeared to be reasonably consistent with the intended constructs of the three GARS-2 subscales, the analysis indicated that more than a third of the GARS-2 items were assigned to the wrong subscale. Internal consistency estimates met or exceeded standards for screening and were generally higher than those in previous studies. Screening sensitivity was .65 and specificity was .81 for the Autism Index using a cut score of 85. Based on these findings, recommendations are made for instrument revision.

摘要

《吉列姆自闭症评定量表第二版》(GARS - 2)是一种广泛使用的筛查工具,有助于自闭症的识别和诊断。本研究的目的是使用特殊教育教师对240名自闭症或其他严重发育障碍个体的评分,来检验GARS - 2的因子结构、内部一致性和筛查敏感性。探索性因子分析得出了一个相关的三因子解决方案,类似于2005年Lecavalier对原始GARS所发现的结果。尽管这三个因子似乎与GARS - 2三个分量表的预期结构相当一致,但分析表明,超过三分之一的GARS - 2项目被分配到了错误的分量表。内部一致性估计达到或超过了筛查标准,并且总体上高于先前研究中的估计。使用85分的临界值时,自闭症指数的筛查敏感性为0.65,特异性为0.81。基于这些发现,提出了对该工具进行修订的建议。

相似文献

1
Factor Structure, Internal Consistency, and Screening Sensitivity of the GARS-2 in a Developmental Disabilities Sample.
Autism Res Treat. 2016;2016:8243079. doi: 10.1155/2016/8243079. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
3
The utility of the Gilliam autism rating scale for identifying Iranian children with autism.
Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(6):452-6. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.797514. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
6
An evaluation of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2005 Dec;35(6):795-805. doi: 10.1007/s10803-005-0025-6.
7
Utility of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale in research and clinical populations.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2002 Dec;32(6):593-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1021211232023.
8
Constructs assessed by the GARS-2: factor analysis of data from the standardization sample.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2010 Sep;40(9):1118-30. doi: 10.1007/s10803-010-0967-1.

本文引用的文献

3
Constructs assessed by the GARS-2: factor analysis of data from the standardization sample.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2010 Sep;40(9):1118-30. doi: 10.1007/s10803-010-0967-1.
4
An evaluation of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2005 Dec;35(6):795-805. doi: 10.1007/s10803-005-0025-6.
5
A RATIONALE AND TEST FOR THE NUMBER OF FACTORS IN FACTOR ANALYSIS.
Psychometrika. 1965 Jun;30:179-85. doi: 10.1007/BF02289447.
6
Utility of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale in research and clinical populations.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2002 Dec;32(6):593-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1021211232023.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验