Language Evolution and Computation Research Unit, School of Philosophy, Psychology & Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh.
Cogn Sci. 2017 Apr;41(3):623-658. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12351. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
The emergence of signaling systems has been observed in numerous experimental and real-world contexts, but there is no consensus on which (if any) shared mechanisms underlie such phenomena. A number of explanatory mechanisms have been proposed within several disciplines, all of which have been instantiated as credible working models. However, they are usually framed as being mutually incompatible. Using an exemplar-based framework, we replicate these models in a minimal configuration which allows us to directly compare them. This reveals that the development of optimal signaling is driven by similar mechanisms in each model, which leads us to propose three requirements for the emergence of conventional signaling. These are the creation and transmission of referential information, a systemic bias against ambiguity, and finally some form of information loss. Considering this, we then discuss some implications for theoretical and experimental approaches to the emergence of learned communication.
信号系统的出现已经在许多实验和真实世界的情境中被观察到,但对于哪些(如果有的话)共同机制是这种现象的基础,还没有共识。在几个学科中已经提出了一些解释机制,它们都被实例化为可信的工作模型。然而,它们通常被认为是相互排斥的。我们使用基于范例的框架,在一个最小的配置中复制这些模型,使我们能够直接比较它们。这表明,在每个模型中,最优信号的发展都是由相似的机制驱动的,这使我们提出了常规信号出现的三个要求。这些要求是参考信息的创建和传递、对模糊性的系统偏差,以及最终某种形式的信息丢失。考虑到这一点,我们随后讨论了一些对学习交流出现的理论和实验方法的影响。