Baab Karen L
Department of Anatomy, Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ 85308, USA.
J Hum Evol. 2016 Mar;92:1-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.11.004. Epub 2016 Jan 9.
The main goals of this study were to evaluate the distinctiveness of Homo erectus neurocranial shape relative to other closely related species, and assess the likelihood that particular fossils were correctly attributed to H. erectus given how shape variation related to geography, time and brain size. This was accomplished through analyses of several sets of landmarks designed to maximize the fossil sample, including 24 putative H. erectus fossils. The question of taxonomic differentiation was initially assessed for the type specimen (Trinil II) and morphologically similar Sangiran fossils and subsequently for increasingly inclusive definitions of H. erectus. Results indicated that H. erectus fossils from China, Indonesia, Georgia and East Africa shared a neurocranial shape that was distinct from that of other Plio-Pleistocene Homo taxa, a pattern only partially accounted for by brain size. Early Indonesian H. erectus formed a morphological "bridge" between earlier and later populations assigned to H. erectus from Africa and Asia, respectively. These results were combined with discrete characters to create a more complete species definition for H. erectus. There were two notable exceptions to the general pattern of H. erectus uniqueness. The 0.8-1.0 Ma (millions of years ago) Daka calvaria from Ethiopia consistently grouped with mid-Pleistocene Homo, including Bodo and Kabwe, rather than African or Asian H. erectus. In addition, Daka also exhibited several traits derived for mid-Pleistocene Homo, and its scaling pattern mirrored mid-Pleistocene Homo rather than H. erectus. Daka may have belonged to an "advanced" H. erectus population close to the root of Homo heidelbergensis sensu lato (s.l.), or to an early population of H. heidelbergensis s.l.. The 1.5 Ma KNM-ER 42700 specimen from Kenya exhibited a unique calvarial shape distinct from H. erectus despite the exclusion of problematic landmarks from the frontal bone. These unique aspects of shape were not present in two other subadult fossils, KNM-WT 15000 and D2700.
本研究的主要目标是评估直立人头骨形状相对于其他近缘物种的独特性,并根据形状变异与地理、时间和脑容量的关系,评估特定化石被正确归为直立人的可能性。这是通过对几组旨在最大化化石样本的地标点进行分析来实现的,其中包括24个推定的直立人化石。分类学差异问题最初是针对模式标本(特里尼尔二号)和形态相似的桑吉兰化石进行评估的,随后针对越来越宽泛的直立人定义进行评估。结果表明,来自中国、印度尼西亚、格鲁吉亚和东非的直立人化石具有一种独特的头骨形状,与其他上新世-更新世人类分类群不同,这种模式仅部分由脑容量来解释。印度尼西亚早期直立人在分别来自非洲和亚洲的早期和晚期直立人种群之间形成了一个形态学“桥梁”。这些结果与离散特征相结合,为直立人创造了一个更完整的物种定义。直立人独特性的一般模式有两个显著例外。来自埃塞俄比亚的距今0.8 - 1.0百万年的达卡颅骨始终与中更新世人类归为一组,包括博多和卡布韦,而不是非洲或亚洲的直立人。此外,达卡还表现出一些中更新世人类特有的特征,其比例模式反映的是中更新世人类而非直立人。达卡可能属于一个接近广义海德堡人根源的“先进”直立人种群,或者属于广义海德堡人的早期种群。来自肯尼亚的距今150万年的KNM - ER 42700标本尽管排除了额骨上有问题的地标点,但仍呈现出一种与直立人不同的独特颅骨形状。另外两个亚成年化石KNM - WT 15000和D2700没有这些独特的形状特征。