Scholes Shaun, Bridges Sally, Ng Fat Linda, Mindell Jennifer S
Health and Social Surveys Research Group, Research Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
NatCen Social Research, 35 Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0AX, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 18;11(3):e0151647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151647. eCollection 2016.
The Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour Assessment Questionnaire (PASBAQ), used within the Health Survey for England (HSE) at 5-yearly intervals, is not included annually due to funding and interview-length constraints. Policy-makers and data-users are keen to consider shorter instruments such as the Short-form International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) for the annual survey. Both questionnaires were administered in HSE 2012, enabling comparative assessment in a random sample of 1252 adults.
Relative agreement using prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted Kappa (PABAK) statistics was estimated for: sufficient aerobic activity (moderate-to-vigorous physical activity [MVPA] ≥150 minutes/week); inactivity (MVPA<30 minutes/week); and excessive sitting (≥540 minutes/weekday). Cross-sectional associations with health outcomes were compared across tertiles of MVPA and tertiles of sitting time using logistic regression with tests for linear trend.
Compared with PASBAQ data, IPAQ-assessed estimates of sufficient aerobic activity and inactivity were higher and lower, respectively; estimates of excessive sitting were higher. Demographic patterns in prevalence were similar. Agreement using PABAK statistics was fair-to-moderate for sufficient aerobic activity (0.32-0.49), moderate-to-substantial for inactivity (0.42-0.74), and moderate-to-substantial for excessive sitting (0.49-0.75). As with the PASBAQ, IPAQ-assessed MVPA and sitting each showed graded associations with mental well-being (women: P for trend = 0.003 and 0.004, respectively) and obesity (women: P for trend = 0.007 and 0.014, respectively).
Capturing habitual physical activity and sedentary behaviour through brief questionnaires is complex. Differences in prevalence estimates can reflect differences in questionnaire structure and content rather than differences in reported behaviour. Treating all IPAQ-assessed walking as moderate-intensity contributed to the differences in prevalence estimates. PASBAQ data will be used for population surveillance every 4 to 5 years. The current version of the Short-form IPAQ was included in HSE 2013-14 to enable more frequent assessment of physical activity and sedentary behaviour; a modified version with different item-ordering and additional questions on walking-pace and effort was included in HSE 2015.
《体力活动与久坐行为评估问卷》(PASBAQ)每5年在英格兰健康调查(HSE)中使用一次,由于资金和访谈时长限制,未每年使用。政策制定者和数据使用者渴望在年度调查中考虑使用如《国际体力活动问卷简表》(IPAQ)这类更简短的工具。这两份问卷都在2012年的HSE中进行了施测,从而能够对1252名成年人的随机样本进行比较评估。
使用患病率调整偏差调整卡帕(PABAK)统计量估计相对一致性,用于评估:充足的有氧运动(中等至剧烈体力活动[MVPA]≥150分钟/周);缺乏运动(MVPA<30分钟/周);以及久坐时间过长(≥540分钟/工作日)。使用逻辑回归和线性趋势检验,比较MVPA三分位数和久坐时间三分位数与健康结局的横断面关联。
与PASBAQ数据相比,IPAQ评估的充足有氧运动和缺乏运动的估计值分别更高和更低;久坐时间过长的估计值更高。患病率的人口统计学模式相似。使用PABAK统计量的一致性,充足有氧运动为一般至中等(0.32 - 0.49),缺乏运动为中等至高度(0.42 - 0.74),久坐时间过长为中等至高度(0.49 - 0.75)。与PASBAQ一样,IPAQ评估的MVPA和久坐时间均与心理健康(女性:趋势P值分别为0.003和0.004)和肥胖(女性:趋势P值分别为0.007和0.014)呈现分级关联。
通过简短问卷获取习惯性体力活动和久坐行为是复杂的。患病率估计值的差异可能反映问卷结构和内容的差异,而非报告行为的差异。将IPAQ评估的所有步行都视为中等强度导致了患病率估计值的差异。PASBAQ数据将每4至5年用于人群监测。IPAQ简表的当前版本被纳入2013 - 2014年的HSE,以便更频繁地评估体力活动和久坐行为;2015年的HSE纳入了一个修改版本,其项目顺序不同,并增加了关于步行速度和努力程度的问题。