Sheffield Haemophilia and Thrombosis Centre, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Bayer Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany.
J Thromb Haemost. 2016 Jun;14(6):1192-9. doi: 10.1111/jth.13322. Epub 2016 May 3.
Essentials Discrepancies can exist in factor VIII activity measured by the one-stage or chromogenic assays. LEOPOLD trial data were used to assess clinical impact of BAY 81-8973 potency assignment assay. Efficacy was not affected by the assay used for potency assignment and dosing of BAY 81-8973. Either assay may be used to measure factor VIII activity after BAY 81-8973 infusion.
Background Product-specific discrepancies have been reported for factor VIII (FVIII) activity determined with one-stage or chromogenic assays. Objective To assess the clinical impact of potency assignment of BAY 81-8973, a full-length, unmodified, recombinant human FVIII, by use of the chromogenic assay or chromogenic assay adjusted to mimic results obtained with the one-stage assay Patients/methods Patients aged 12-65 years with severe hemophilia A received BAY 81-8973 in LEOPOLD I (20-50 IU kg(-1) two or three times weekly [investigator decision]) and LEOPOLD II (randomized to 20-30 IU kg(-1) twice weekly, 30-40 IU kg(-1) three times weekly, or on-demand treatment). Both trials included two 6-month crossover periods in which potency labeling was determined with the chromogenic substrate assay as per the European Pharmacopoeia (CS/EP) or the chromogenic substrate assay adjusted to mimic results obtained with the one-stage assay (CS/ADJ). The annualized bleeding rate (ABR) and FVIII incremental recovery were assessed by the use of pooled data. Results The analysis was perfomed on 121 patients. Median (quartile [Q] 1; Q3) ABRs during the CS/EP and CS/ADJ periods were 1.98 (0; 5.92) and 1.98 (0; 7.34), respectively. The mean incremental recovery was > 2 IU dL(-1) per IU kg(-1) in both periods with the use of either assay for postinfusion FVIII measurements. The median (Q1; Q3) chromogenic/one-stage assay recovery ratio was 1.054 (0.892; 1.150) for the CS/EP period when a plasma standard was used for calibration. Conclusions No impact on the ABR was observed with chromogenic-based as compared with one-stage assay-based potency and dosing. Either assay may be used to determine FVIII plasma activity after infusion of BAY 81-8973 without the need for a product-specific standard.
使用发色底物测定法或调整后的发色底物测定法(模拟一期法测定结果)评估贝依奥法(BAY 81-8973)效价赋值对患者的临床影响。患者/方法:年龄 12-65 岁的严重 A 型血友病患者在 LEOPOLD I 试验(20-50IUkg-1,每周 2-3 次[研究者决定])和 LEOPOLD II 试验(随机分配至 20-30IUkg-1,每周 2 次,30-40IUkg-1,每周 3 次,按需治疗)中接受 BAY 81-8973 治疗。这两项试验均包含 2 个为期 6 个月的交叉周期,在此期间,采用发色底物测定法(按欧洲药典规定,CS/EP;或调整后的发色底物测定法,模拟一期法测定结果,CS/ADJ)测定效价标签。使用汇总数据评估年化出血率(ABR)和 FVIII 增量恢复。结果:对 121 例患者进行了分析。在 CS/EP 和 CS/ADJ 期间,中位(四分位数[Q]1;Q3)ABR 分别为 1.98(0;5.92)和 1.98(0;7.34)。在这两个期间,使用任何一种测定法进行输注后 FVIII 测量,平均增量恢复均>2IUdL-1每 IUkg-1。当使用血浆标准品进行校准时,CS/EP 期间的中位(Q1;Q3)发色底物/一期法测定回收率比值为 1.054(0.892;1.150)。结论:与基于一期法的效价和剂量相比,基于发色底物的测定法对 ABR 无影响。在不使用特定产品标准品的情况下,两种测定法均可用于确定 BAY 81-8973 输注后 FVIII 血浆活性。