Silami Francisca Daniele Jardilino, Tonani Rafaella, Alandia-Román Carla Cecilia, Pires-de-Souza Fernanda de Carvalho Panzeri
Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Dental School of Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Braz Dent J. 2016 Jan-Feb;27(1):95-100. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201600348.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of accelerated aging (AAA) on the color stability of resin cements for bonding ceramic laminate veneers of different thicknesses. The occlusal surfaces of 80 healthy human molars were flattened. Ceramic laminate veneers (IPS e-max Ceram) of two thicknesses (0.5 and 1.0 mm) were bonded with three types of luting agents: light-cured, conventional dual and self-adhesive dual cement. Teeth without restorations and cement samples (0.5 mm) were used as control. After initial color evaluations, the samples were subjected to AAA for 580 h. After this, new color readouts were made, and the color stability (ΔE) and luminosity (ΔL) data were analyzed. The greatest color changes (p<0.05) occurred when 0.5 mm veneers were fixed with light-cured cement and the lowest when 1.0 mm veneers were fixed with conventional dual cement. There was no influence of the restoration thickness when the self-adhesive dual cement was used. When veneers were compared with the control groups, it was verified that the cement samples presented the greatest alterations (p<0.05) in comparison with both substrates and restored teeth. Therefore, it was concluded that the thickness of the restoration influences color and luminosity changes for conventional dual and light-cured cements. The changes in self-adhesive cement do not depend on restoration thickness.
本研究的目的是评估加速老化(AAA)对用于粘结不同厚度陶瓷贴面的树脂水门汀颜色稳定性的影响。将80颗健康人磨牙的咬合面磨平。用三种类型的粘结剂粘结两种厚度(0.5和1.0毫米)的陶瓷贴面(IPS e-max Ceram):光固化、传统双固化和自粘结双固化水门汀。未修复的牙齿和水门汀样本(0.5毫米)用作对照。在进行初始颜色评估后,将样本进行580小时的加速老化处理。之后,进行新的颜色读数,并分析颜色稳定性(ΔE)和明度(ΔL)数据。当用0.5毫米的贴面与光固化水门汀固定时,颜色变化最大(p<0.05),而当用1.0毫米的贴面与传统双固化水门汀固定时,颜色变化最小。使用自粘结双固化水门汀时,修复体厚度没有影响。当将贴面与对照组进行比较时,证实与两种基底和修复后的牙齿相比,水门汀样本的变化最大(p<0.05)。因此,得出结论,对于传统双固化和光固化水门汀,修复体厚度会影响颜色和明度变化。自粘结水门汀的变化不取决于修复体厚度。