Pierron Romain J G, Pouzoulet Jérôme, Couderc Christel, Judic Elodie, Compant Stéphane, Jacques Alban
Equipe Agrophysiologie et Agromolécules, Département des Sciences Agronomiques et Agroalimentaires, Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse - Ecole d'Ingénieurs de Purpan, Université de ToulouseToulouse, France; Département BioSym, LGC UMR 5503 (CNRS/UPS/INPT), INP-ENSAT Université de ToulouseCastanet-Tolosan, France.
Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside CA, USA.
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Mar 11;7:268. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00268. eCollection 2016.
Defense mechanisms in woody tissue are poorly understood, especially in vine colonized by trunk pathogens. However, several investigations suggest that molecular mechanisms in the central tissue of Vitis vinifera L. may be involved in trunk-defense reactions. In this work, the perception of Phaeoacremonium aleophilum and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora alone or together were investigated in cuttings of Cabernet Sauvignon trunks. Plant responses were analyzed at the tissue level via optical microscopy and at the cellular level via plant-gene expression. The microscopy results revealed that, 6 weeks after pathogen inoculation, newly formed vascular tissue is less developed in plants inoculated with P. chlamydospora than in plants inoculated with P. aleophilum. Co-inoculation with both pathogens resulted in an intermediate phenotype. Further analysis showed the relative expression of the following grapevine genes: PAL, PR10.3, TL, TLb, Vv17.3, STS, STS8, CWinv, PIN, CAM, LOX at 10, 24, 48, and 120 h post-inoculation (hpi). The gene set was induced by wounding before inoculation with the different pathogens, except for the genes CAM and LOX. This response generated significant noise, but the expression of the grapevine genes (PAL, PR10.3, TL, TLb, Vv17.3, STS, STS8, CWinv, and PIN) still differed due to perception of mycelium by the plant. Furthermore, at 48 hpi, the induction of PAL and STS8 differs depending on the pathogen, and a specific pattern emerges from the different inductions associated with the different treatments. Based on these results, we conclude that V. vinifera L. trunk perceives the presence of pathogens differently depending on the inoculated pathogen or even on the combination of co-inoculated pathogens, suggesting a defense orchestration in the perennial organs of woody plants.
木本组织中的防御机制尚不清楚,尤其是在被树干病原体侵染的葡萄藤中。然而,多项研究表明,葡萄(Vitis vinifera L.)中央组织中的分子机制可能参与树干防御反应。在这项研究中,我们研究了赤霞珠葡萄树干插条对嗜土色暗梗孢(Phaeoacremonium aleophilum)和葡萄生单囊壳孢(Phaeomoniella chlamydospora)单独或共同侵染的反应。通过光学显微镜在组织水平和通过植物基因表达在细胞水平分析植物反应。显微镜结果显示,病原体接种6周后,接种葡萄生单囊壳孢的植物中新形成的维管组织比接种嗜土色暗梗孢的植物发育程度低。两种病原体共同接种导致中间表型。进一步分析显示了以下葡萄基因在接种后10、24、48和120小时(hpi)的相对表达:PAL、PR10.3、TL、TLb、Vv17.3、STS、STS8、CWinv、PIN、CAM、LOX。除了基因CAM和LOX外,在接种不同病原体之前,该基因集因创伤而被诱导。这种反应产生了显著的干扰,但由于植物对菌丝体的感知,葡萄基因(PAL、PR10.3、TL、TLb、Vv17.3、STS、STS8、CWinv和PIN)的表达仍然存在差异。此外,在接种后48小时,PAL和STS8的诱导因病原体而异,并且从与不同处理相关的不同诱导中出现了特定模式。基于这些结果,我们得出结论,葡萄树干根据接种的病原体甚至共同接种病原体的组合,对病原体的存在有不同的感知,这表明木本植物多年生器官中存在防御协调机制。