Suda Takashi, Kaneda Shinji, Hachimaru Ayumi, Tochii Daisuke, Maeda Ryo, Tochii Sachiko, Takagi Yasushi
Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98 Dengakugakubo Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan.
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Mar;8(Suppl 3):S265-71. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2016.02.34.
We have previously reported on single-port thymectomy (SPT), which involves performing thymectomy via a single subxiphoid incision, and trans-subxiphoid robotic thymectomy (TRT), which is performed using the da Vinci surgical system. The aim of this study was to investigate the early surgical outcomes of thymectomy using the SPT and TRT subxiphoid approaches and to discuss their appropriate uses.
The subjects included 80 patients who underwent thymectomy via a subxiphoid approach. These patients were selected from among 99 surgical cases of myasthenia gravis or anterior mediastinal tumors at Fujita Health University Hospital between March 2011 and November 2015. The patients were divided into a SPT group (n=72) and a TRT group (n=8).
The operative time was shorter in the SPT group compared with that in the TRT group (135±48 and 20±40 min, respectively; P=0.0004). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of blood loss volume (5.9±16.8 and 5.4±4.6 mL, respectively; P=0.48), postoperative hospital stay duration (4.0±2.0 and 4.3±3.6 days, respectively; P=0.21), or the period of postoperative oral analgesic use (10.7±5.4 and 10.1±3.4 days, respectively; P=0.89). There were no intraoperative complications, such as intraoperative bleeding, in either group. In the SPT group, there was one case (1.4%) of postoperative left phrenic nerve paralysis and one case (1.4%) of transient paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. No one died during or after the surgery.
TRT may be as equally minimally invasive as SPT. In cases where the thymoma has infiltrated the surrounding organs, the extent of the infiltration should be used to determine whether to select TRT, or median sternotomy.
我们之前报道过单孔胸腺切除术(SPT),即通过单个剑突下切口进行胸腺切除术,以及经剑突下机器人胸腺切除术(TRT),其使用达芬奇手术系统进行。本研究的目的是调查采用SPT和TRT剑突下入路进行胸腺切除术的早期手术结果,并讨论它们的适当应用。
研究对象包括80例行剑突下入路胸腺切除术的患者。这些患者选自2011年3月至2015年11月间藤田保健大学医院99例重症肌无力或前纵隔肿瘤的手术病例。患者分为SPT组(n = 72)和TRT组(n = 8)。
SPT组的手术时间比TRT组短(分别为135±48分钟和20±40分钟;P = 0.0004)。两组在失血量(分别为5.9±16.8毫升和5.4±4.6毫升;P = 0.48)、术后住院时间(分别为4.0±2.0天和4.3±3.6天;P = 0.21)或术后口服镇痛药使用时间(分别为10.7±5.4天和10.1±3.4天;P = 0.89)方面无显著差异。两组均无术中并发症,如术中出血。在SPT组,有1例(1.4%)术后出现左侧膈神经麻痹,1例(1.4%)出现短暂阵发性心房颤动。手术期间及术后均无死亡病例。
TRT可能与SPT具有同样的微创性。在胸腺瘤侵犯周围器官的情况下,应根据侵犯程度来决定是选择TRT还是正中胸骨切开术。