Choudhury I, Ahmed K M, Hasan M, Mozumder M R H, Knappett P S K, Ellis T, van Geen A
Department of Geology, University of Dhaka, Nilkhet Rd, Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh.
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, 61 Route 9w, Palisades, NY, 10964.
Ground Water. 2016 Nov;54(6):871-877. doi: 10.1111/gwat.12417. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
One of the mainstays of mitigation to reduce the exposure of the rural population of Bangladesh to arsenic (As) from private, mostly <90-m deep wells over the past 15 years has been the installation of over 300,000 deeper community wells. A comprehensive testing campaign previously conducted across a 180 km of area of Bangladesh identified 9 out of total of 927 wells >90 m deep that contained >50 µg/L arsenic. We show here that for five of these nine wells, conductivity profiles obtained after spiking the well bore with salt indicate a shallow leak that could explain the high As in the well water. In two of the five leaky wells, the presence of additional screens at the depth of the leak was documented with a downhole camera. The downhole camera did not detect anomalies in the construction of the remaining three leaky wells or in the four wells that did not leak. The four wells that did not leak were all >150-m deep and located in two villages separated by less than 500 m. Excluding these two villages and a handful of leaky wells, the results indicate an aquifer that is consistently low in As over a sizeable area at depths >90 m. Isolated cases of public wells that are elevated in As that have been reported elsewhere in Bangladesh may therefore reflect improper installation rather than actual contamination of the deep aquifer.
在过去15年里,为减少孟加拉国农村人口通过私人浅井(大多深度小于90米)接触砷(As),一项主要的缓解措施是安装了超过30万口更深的社区井。此前在孟加拉国180公里区域开展的一项全面检测活动,在927口深度大于90米的井中,发现了9口井的砷含量超过50微克/升。我们在此表明,对于这9口井中的5口,在向井筒注入盐分后获得的电导率剖面显示存在浅层渗漏,这可以解释井水中砷含量高的原因。在5口渗漏井中的2口,通过井下摄像机记录到在渗漏深度处有额外的滤网。井下摄像机未检测到其余3口渗漏井或4口未渗漏井的构造存在异常。4口未渗漏的井深度均超过150米,位于两个相距不到500米的村庄。排除这两个村庄和少数渗漏井后,结果表明在深度大于90米的相当大区域内,含水层中的砷含量一直较低。因此,孟加拉国其他地方报告的公共井中砷含量升高的个别案例,可能反映的是安装不当,而非深层含水层实际受到污染。