Jordan Sumanas W, Khavanin Nima, Kim John Y S
Chicago, Ill.
From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Apr;137(4):1104-1116. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000481102.24444.72.
Seroma, as a complication of prosthetic breast reconstruction, results in patient distress, increased office visits, undesirable aesthetic outcomes, and--importantly--may escalate to infection and frank prosthesis loss. Herein, the authors review the pathophysiology and risk factors and attempt to collate published practices for avoidance and management of seroma.
A systematic literature review was performed using MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies published between 2000 and January of 2015. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate the overall pooled incidence of seroma and to examine the effect of drain number and acellular dermal matrix use.
Seventy-two relevant primary articles and three systematic reviews were identified. Fifty-one citations met inclusion criteria, including two randomized controlled trials. The overall pooled incidence was 5.4 percent (95 percent CI, 4.1 to 6.7 percent). Obesity, acellular dermal matrix, and preoperative irradiation were cited risk factors. Pooled relative risk for acellular dermal matrix was 1.83 (95 percent CI, 1.28 to 2.62). Drain practices were collated from 34 articles.
Seromas following prosthetic breast reconstruction are complicated by the hypovascular, proinflammatory milieu of the mastectomy skin flap, the geometrically complex dead space, and the presence of a foreign body with potential contamination and biofilm. There is reasonable evidence to suggest that these factors contribute to a progression of seroma to infection and prosthesis loss. These findings have motivated this summary article on current practice guidelines and strategies to prevent and treat seromas.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.
血清肿作为假体乳房重建的一种并发症,会给患者带来痛苦,增加门诊就诊次数,导致不理想的美学效果,而且重要的是,可能会发展为感染甚至假体完全丢失。在此,作者回顾了血清肿的病理生理学和危险因素,并试图整理已发表的关于血清肿预防和处理的方法。
利用医学文献数据库(MEDLINE)、科学网(Web of Science)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(Embase)和考克兰图书馆,对2000年至2015年1月发表的研究进行系统的文献综述。采用随机效应荟萃分析来估计血清肿的总体合并发生率,并研究引流管数量和使用脱细胞真皮基质的影响。
共识别出72篇相关的原始文章和3篇系统综述。51篇文献符合纳入标准,包括2项随机对照试验。总体合并发生率为5.4%(95%可信区间,4.1%至6.7%)。肥胖、脱细胞真皮基质和术前放疗被列为危险因素。脱细胞真皮基质的合并相对风险为1.83(95%可信区间,1.28至2.62)。从34篇文章中整理出了引流方法。
假体乳房重建后的血清肿因乳房切除皮瓣的低血运、促炎环境、几何形状复杂的死腔以及存在潜在污染和生物膜的异物而变得复杂。有合理证据表明,这些因素会导致血清肿发展为感染和假体丢失。这些发现促使撰写了这篇关于预防和治疗血清肿的当前实践指南和策略的总结文章。
临床问题/证据级别:风险,II级