Suppr超能文献

初级保健中预防重度抑郁症的干预:一项集群随机试验。

Intervention to Prevent Major Depression in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Trial.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2016 May 17;164(10):656-65. doi: 10.7326/M14-2653. Epub 2016 Mar 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Not enough is known about universal prevention of depression in adults.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention to prevent major depression.

DESIGN

Multicenter, cluster randomized trial with sites randomly assigned to usual care or an intervention. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01151982).

SETTING

10 primary care centers in each of 7 cities in Spain.

PARTICIPANTS

Two primary care physicians (PCPs) and 5236 nondepressed adult patients were randomly sampled from each center; 3326 patients consented and were eligible to participate.

INTERVENTION

For each patient, PCPs communicated individual risk for depression and personal predictors of risk and developed a psychosocial program tailored to prevent depression.

MEASUREMENTS

New cases of major depression, assessed every 6 months for 18 months.

RESULTS

At 18 months, 7.39% of patients in the intervention group (95% CI, 5.85% to 8.95%) developed major depression compared with 9.40% in the control (usual care) group (CI, 7.89% to 10.92%) (absolute difference, -2.01 percentage points [CI, -4.18 to 0.16 percentage points]; P = 0.070). Depression incidence was lower in the intervention centers in 5 cities and similar between intervention and control centers in 2 cities.

LIMITATION

Potential self-selection bias due to nonconsenting patients.

CONCLUSION

Compared with usual care, an intervention based on personal predictors of risk for depression implemented by PCPs provided a modest but nonsignificant reduction in the incidence of major depression. Additional study of this approach may be warranted.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Institute of Health Carlos III.

摘要

背景

人们对成年人的抑郁普遍预防知之甚少。

目的

评估预防重度抑郁症的干预措施的有效性。

设计

多中心、集群随机试验,将地点随机分配至常规护理或干预组。(ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT01151982)。

地点

西班牙 7 个城市的每个城市的 10 个初级保健中心。

参与者

从每个中心随机抽取两名初级保健医生(PCP)和 5236 名未患抑郁症的成年患者;有 3326 名患者同意并符合参与条件。

干预措施

对于每位患者,PCP 均沟通了其个人抑郁风险以及个人风险预测因素,并制定了针对预防抑郁的量身定制的心理社会计划。

测量

每 6 个月评估一次,共 18 个月,新发重度抑郁症病例。

结果

在 18 个月时,干预组(95%CI,5.85%至 8.95%)中有 7.39%的患者出现重度抑郁症,而对照组(常规护理)中有 9.40%的患者(95%CI,7.89%至 10.92%)(绝对差异,-2.01 个百分点[95%CI,-4.18 至 0.16 个百分点];P=0.070)。在 5 个城市中,干预中心的抑郁症发病率较低,而在 2 个城市中,干预中心和对照组之间的抑郁症发病率相似。

局限性

由于未同意的患者,可能存在潜在的自我选择偏倚。

结论

与常规护理相比,由 PCP 实施的基于抑郁风险个人预测因素的干预措施可适度但无统计学意义地降低重度抑郁症的发病率。可能需要进一步研究这种方法。

主要资金来源

卡洛斯三世卫生研究所。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验