顺行股骨髓内固定不同进针点的横断面研究
CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY ON DIFFERENT ENTRY POINTS FOR ANTEROGRADE FEMORAL INTRAMEDULLARY OSTEOSYNTHESIS.
作者信息
Kanas Michel, Wajnsztejn Andre, Roucourt Danilo, Fiorentino Eduardo, Fernandes Hélio Jorge Alvachian, Dos Reis Fernando Baldy
机构信息
Resident Physician in the Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Unifesp/EPM, São Paulo, Brazil.
Physician; Member of the Locomotor System Traumatology Sector, Discipline of Traumatology, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Unifesp/EPM, São Paulo, Brazil.
出版信息
Rev Bras Ortop. 2015 Dec 6;46(5):514-9. doi: 10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30405-5. eCollection 2011 Sep-Oct.
OBJECTIVE
To analyze the degree of knowledge among professionals who treat fractures using the recommended technique, with regard to correlating the nail with the entry point that is considered appropriate.
METHODS
A questionnaire that presented five types of nail and simulated a transverse diaphyseal fracture of the femur was developed.
RESULTS
Responses regarding the entry points corresponding to choosing the type of nail were obtained from 370 orthopedists who were participating in the 41(st) Brazilian Congress of Orthopedics and Traumatology. It was observed that only 20% correctly identified the entry point and that there was no difference between the professionals within the specialty of Traumatology and the others.
CONCLUSION
It was concluded that the majority of the physicians attending the congress were unaware of the entry points.
目的
分析使用推荐技术治疗骨折的专业人员在将髓内钉与合适的进针点相关联方面的知识水平。
方法
设计了一份问卷，其中展示了五种类型的髓内钉，并模拟了股骨干横形骨折。
结果
从参加第41届巴西骨科学与创伤学大会的370名骨科医生那里获得了关于对应所选髓内钉类型的进针点的回答。观察到只有20%的人正确识别了进针点，并且创伤学专业的专业人员与其他人员之间没有差异。
结论
得出的结论是，参加大会的大多数医生不知道进针点。
Zotero 插件