Thiel V, Lausmaa J, Sjövall P, Ragazzi E, Seyfullah L J, Schmidt A R
Geobiology, Geoscience Centre, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany.
SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, Borås, Sweden.
Geobiology. 2016 Jul;14(4):364-73. doi: 10.1111/gbi.12180. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
During the past two decades, a plethora of fossil micro-organisms have been described from various Triassic to Miocene ambers. However, in addition to entrapped microbes, ambers commonly contain microscopic inclusions that sometimes resemble amoebae, ciliates, microfungi, and unicellular algae in size and shape, but do not provide further diagnostic features thereof. For a better assessment of the actual fossil record of unicellular eukaryotes in amber, we studied equivalent inclusions in modern resin of the Araucariaceae; this conifer family comprises important amber-producers in Earth history. Using time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS), we investigated the chemical nature of the inclusion matter and the resin matrix. Whereas the matrix, as expected, showed a more hydrocarbon/aromatic-dominated composition, the inclusions contain abundant salt ions and polar organics. However, the absence of signals characteristic for cellular biomass, namely distinctive proteinaceous amino acids and lipid moieties, indicates that the inclusions do not contain microbial cellular matter but salts and hydrophilic organic substances that probably derived from the plant itself. Rather than representing protists or their remains, these microbe-like inclusions, for which we propose the term 'pseudoinclusions', consist of compounds that are immiscible with the terpenoid resin matrix and were probably secreted in small amounts together with the actual resin by the plant tissue. Consequently, reports of protists from amber that are only based on the similarity of the overall shape and size to extant taxa, but do not provide relevant features at light-microscopical and ultrastructural level, cannot be accepted as unambiguous fossil evidence for these particular groups.
在过去的二十年里,人们从各种三叠纪到中新世的琥珀中发现了大量的化石微生物。然而,除了被困的微生物外,琥珀中通常还含有微小的内含物,这些内含物在大小和形状上有时类似于变形虫、纤毛虫、微真菌和单细胞藻类,但没有提供进一步的诊断特征。为了更好地评估琥珀中单细胞真核生物的实际化石记录,我们研究了南洋杉科现代树脂中的等效内含物;这个针叶树科在地球历史上是重要的琥珀生产者。我们使用飞行时间二次离子质谱(ToF-SIMS)研究了内含物物质和树脂基质的化学性质。正如预期的那样,基质显示出以碳氢化合物/芳香族为主的组成,而内含物含有丰富的盐离子和极性有机物。然而,缺乏细胞生物质特有的信号,即独特的蛋白质氨基酸和脂质部分,表明内含物不包含微生物细胞物质,而是可能来自植物本身的盐和亲水性有机物质。这些类似微生物的内含物,我们称之为“假内含物”,并非代表原生生物或它们的遗骸,而是由与萜类树脂基质不混溶的化合物组成,可能是植物组织与实际树脂一起少量分泌的。因此,仅基于整体形状和大小与现存分类群的相似性而没有提供光学显微镜和超微结构水平相关特征的琥珀中原生生物报告,不能被接受为这些特定类群的确切化石证据。