Harbeck N, Iyer S, Turner N, Cristofanilli M, Ro J, André F, Loi S, Verma S, Iwata H, Bhattacharyya H, Puyana Theall K, Bartlett C H, Loibl S
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brustzentrum der Universität München, München (LMU), Germany.
Pfizer Inc, New York, USA.
Ann Oncol. 2016 Jun;27(6):1047-1054. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw139. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
In the PALOMA-3 study, palbociclib plus fulvestrant demonstrated improved progression-free survival compared with fulvestrant plus placebo in hormone receptor-positive, HER2- endocrine-resistant metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This analysis compared patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between the two treatment groups.
Patients were randomized 2 : 1 to receive palbociclib 125 mg/day orally for 3 weeks followed by 1 week off (n = 347) plus fulvestrant (500 mg i.m. per standard of care) or placebo plus fulvestrant (n = 174). PROs were assessed on day 1 of cycles 1-4 and of every other subsequent cycle starting with cycle 6 using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and its breast cancer module, QLQ-BR23. High scores (range 0-100) could indicate better functioning/quality of life (QoL) or worse symptom severity. Repeated-measures mixed-effect analyses were carried out to compare on-treatment overall scores and changes from baseline between treatment groups while controlling for baseline. Between-group comparisons of time to deterioration in global QoL and pain were made using an unstratified log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model.
Questionnaire completion rates were high at baseline and during treatment (from baseline to cycle 14, ≥95.8% in each group completed ≥1 question on the EORTC QLQ-C30). On treatment, estimated overall global QoL scores significantly favored the palbociclib plus fulvestrant group [66.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 64.5-67.7 versus 63.0, 95% CI 60.6-65.3; P = 0.0313]. Significantly greater improvement from baseline in pain was also observed in this group (-3.3, 95% CI -5.1 to -1.5 versus 2.0, 95% CI -0.6 to 4.6; P = 0.0011). No significant differences were observed for other QLQ-BR23 functioning domains, breast or arm symptoms. Treatment with palbociclib plus fulvestrant significantly delayed deterioration in global QoL (P < 0.025) and pain (P < 0.001) compared with fulvestrant alone.
Palbociclib plus fulvestrant allowed patients to maintain good QoL in the endocrine resistance setting while experiencing substantially delayed disease progression.
NCT01942135.
在PALOMA-3研究中,与氟维司群加安慰剂相比,哌柏西利联合氟维司群在激素受体阳性、HER2-内分泌抵抗性转移性乳腺癌(MBC)中显示出无进展生存期改善。本分析比较了两个治疗组之间患者报告的结局(PRO)。
患者按2:1随机分组,接受哌柏西利125mg/天口服,连续3周,随后停药1周(n = 347)加氟维司群(按标准治疗为500mg肌肉注射)或安慰剂加氟维司群(n = 174)。使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)及其乳腺癌模块QLQ-BR23在第1-4周期的第1天以及从第6周期开始的每一个后续周期评估PRO。高分(范围0-100)可能表明功能/生活质量(QoL)更好或症状严重程度更差。进行重复测量混合效应分析以比较治疗期间的总体评分以及治疗组之间相对于基线的变化,同时控制基线。使用未分层的对数秩检验和Cox比例风险模型对总体QoL和疼痛恶化时间进行组间比较。
在基线和治疗期间问卷完成率很高(从基线到第14周期,每组≥95.8%的患者完成了关于EORTC QLQ-C30的≥1个问题)。在治疗中,估计的总体全球QoL评分显著有利于哌柏西利加氟维司群组[66.1,95%置信区间(CI)64.5-67.7对63.0,95%CI 60.6-65.3;P = 0.0313]。在该组中还观察到疼痛相对于基线有显著更大的改善(-3.3,95%CI -5.1至-1.5对2.0,95%CI -0.6至4.6;P = 0.0011)。对于其他QLQ-BR23功能领域、乳房或手臂症状未观察到显著差异。与单独使用氟维司群相比,哌柏西利联合氟维司群治疗显著延迟了总体QoL(P < 0.025)和疼痛(P < 0.001)的恶化。
哌柏西利联合氟维司群使患者在内分泌抵抗情况下维持良好的QoL,同时疾病进展显著延迟。
NCT01942135。