Strøm Benedicte S, Ytrehus Siri, Grov Ellen-Karine
Center of Diakonia and Professional Practice, VID Specialized University, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Nursing and Health, VID Specialized University, Oslo, Norway.
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Jul;25(13-14):1805-34. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13169. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
To provide an overview of available sensory stimulation interventions, and their effect on persons with dementia and to present theoretical and methodological characteristics of the studies included.
Different sensory stimulation interventions are used for persons with dementia to increase alertness, reduce agitation and improve quality of life. However, the effect of these interventions is not clear, neither are their characteristics.
A systematic search and review of the literature with description of the content and an evaluation of theoretical and methodological approaches.
Systematic searches in CINAHL, PubMed (Medline), The Cochrane library and PsycINFO. Studies included have been subject to quality assessment by means of Critical Appraisal Skills Programme.
Fifty-five studies were included and thirty of these documented significant effect. The effect of the sensory stimulation interventions mainly reported on negative behaviours, except from five studies assessing quality of life and well-being. The majority of the studies had methodological limitations. The different sensory stimulation interventions were organised into eight categories: music, light therapy, acupressure/reflexology, massage/aromatherapy and doll therapy/pet therapy/toy therapy, the Sonas programme and Snoezelen.
More studies are needed to clarify appropriate substantial background for the specific interventions. However, most of the studies based their interventions on a theoretical foundation. Furthermore, more research is needed to measure the effect of sensory stimulation on communication as well as quality of life. In addition, studies are to focus on whether the effect depends on the stage of dementia.
Nurses are to be aware of sensory stimulation as a possible intervention to improve persons' quality of life.
概述现有的感官刺激干预措施及其对痴呆症患者的影响,并介绍所纳入研究的理论和方法学特点。
针对痴呆症患者采用了不同的感官刺激干预措施,以提高警觉性、减少躁动并改善生活质量。然而,这些干预措施的效果尚不清楚,其特点也不明确。
对文献进行系统检索和综述,描述内容并评估理论和方法学方法。
在CINAHL、PubMed(医学索引)、Cochrane图书馆和PsycINFO中进行系统检索。所纳入的研究已通过批判性评估技能计划进行质量评估。
纳入了55项研究,其中30项记录了显著效果。感官刺激干预措施的效果主要报告在负面行为上,有5项研究评估了生活质量和幸福感的除外。大多数研究存在方法学局限性。不同的感官刺激干预措施分为八类:音乐、光疗法、指压/反射疗法、按摩/芳香疗法以及玩偶疗法/宠物疗法/玩具疗法、索纳斯计划和多感官环境疗法。
需要更多研究来阐明特定干预措施的适当实质性背景。然而,大多数研究的干预措施都基于理论基础。此外,需要更多研究来衡量感官刺激对沟通以及生活质量的影响。此外,研究应关注效果是否取决于痴呆症的阶段。
护士应意识到感官刺激作为一种可能改善患者生活质量的干预措施。