Scott Elaine S, Murphy Lyn Stankiewicz, Warshawsky Nora E
Author Affiliations: Associate Professor (Dr Scott), College of Nursing, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina; Associate Professor (Dr Murphy), School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore; Assistant Professor (Dr Warshawsky), School of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
J Nurs Adm. 2016 May;46(5):238-44. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000337.
The aim of this study is to determine the priorities for nursing administration research (NAR) in the United States.
Previously known as the Council of Graduate Educators in Administrative Nursing, CGEAN provides an avenue for researchers and educators focused on NAR to partner, dialogue, obtain funding resources, and present their findings at a biennial International Nursing Administration Research Conference (INARC). In late 2013, with a goal of building consensus, CGEAN convened an INARC postconference to initiate the process of establishing critical NAR priorities for the future.
Data from a 3-staged Delphi study were used to identify relevant research topics and determine administrative research priorities.
Eight final categories of NAR were determined.
This study found economic valuing of nursing and designing effective future healthcare delivery systems to be high priorities for NAR.
本研究旨在确定美国护理管理研究(NAR)的优先事项。
CGEAN前身为护理管理研究生教育委员会,为专注于护理管理研究的研究人员和教育工作者提供了一个合作、对话、获取资金资源以及在两年一次的国际护理管理研究会议(INARC)上展示研究成果的平台。2013年末,为达成共识,CGEAN召开了一次INARC会后会议,启动了为未来确定关键护理管理研究优先事项的进程。
采用三阶段德尔菲研究的数据来确定相关研究主题并确定管理研究优先事项。
确定了护理管理研究的八个最终类别。
本研究发现,护理的经济价值评估以及设计有效的未来医疗保健提供系统是护理管理研究的高度优先事项。